Look away from the bear
An epic opening paragraph by Olivia Nuzzi at New York Magazine:
Donald Trump was impeached twice, lost the 2020 election by 7,052,770 votes, is entangled in investigations by federal prosecutors (over the Capitol insurrection and over the mishandling of classified White House documents and over election interference) and the District of Columbia attorney general (over financial fraud at the Presidential Inaugural Committee) and the Manhattan district attorney (over financial fraud at the Trump Organization) and the New York State attorney general (over financial fraud at the Trump Organization) and the Westchester County district attorney (over financial fraud at the Trump Organization) and the Fulton County, Georgia, district attorney (over criminal election interference in Georgia) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (over rules violations in plans to take his social-media company public through a SPAC) and the House Select Committee on January 6 (whose hearings are the runaway TV-ratings hit of the summer), yet on Monday, July 11, he was in a fantastic mood.
Ten investigations by eight institutions, but it’s water off a duck’s back to him because he’s a hardened criminal who doesn’t give a rat’s ass about anyone who isn’t Donald Trump. He’d make a great president!
There’s a long, funny section on how he explains to himself Princess Ivanka’s disavowal of him after January 6.
When I raised the subject of the testimony, Trump paused. “Well, I think she wanted to be nice and respectful,” he said, “She’s a very high-quality person, and I don’t think she wanted to hurt anybody’s feelings. I thought that Barr was weak and pathetic, and I think that she doesn’t want to hurt somebody’s feelings.” It came across like he was trying to convince himself of what he said. “I’m not even sure she knew what my feelings were. He didn’t want to be impeached, so he didn’t do his job in order to not get impeached,” he added, channeling his daughter channeling himself. “I don’t think she knew that.”
Has he talked to her about it since? “I’d rather not say. I’d rather not say,” he said. “But she’s a good person, and she doesn’t want to hurt people’s feelings. She has respect for everybody, and there’s something very nice about that, actually.”
Why yes, there is; he should try it some time.
Did he think that she took after him in that respect? “No,” he said, with a laugh. “I don’t think so. We’re a little different in that regard.”
Heh heh heh. Yes, because he’s a sadist and a ruthless self-dealer who doesn’t respect anyone but himself.
Abruptly, Trump changed the subject in the most Trumpian of ways. “Did you see Alaska, and did you see Las Vegas? I’ll tell ya, the enthusiasm and the crowds are bigger than they’ve ever been,” he said. “The enthusiasm is greater than it’s ever been.” It does not seem a wholly conscious choice when he does this but like a feature that activates when he is nervous or uncomfortable and zaps him, like magic, into command as The Donald again, which is maybe why he is unable to resist doing it even when doing it could only make things worse.
He’s an attention junkie. Not new information.
When I asked if the insurrection had embarrassed him, he disputed the premise that it was committed on his behalf. “They did it on their own behalf,” he said. He disputed, too, that the insurrectionists were armed. “I don’t think one person in the Capitol had a weapon, not one weapon,” he said. And he disputed my characterization of a swarm of MAGA hats charging the Capitol. “And other hats. And other hats. Not just MAGA hats. Other hats,” he said. “There were a lot of people there that a lot of other people don’t want to talk about, but they’re also one of the largest crowds I’ve ever spoken to, when I made the speech — peacefully, it should be known as peacefully and patriotically — but when I made the speech, it was one of the largest crowds I’ve ever spoken to.” He threw in a distinction between his crowd, which he said did not go to the Capitol, and the insurrectionists. “Nobody ever talks about that,” he said, but he didn’t want to talk about it much, either. He returned to the point of all of this: “I don’t think I’ve ever spoken in front of a larger crowd.”
Wait a minute while I make a note of it.
Trump swears that shielding himself from prosecution is not among his reasons for running for president because he is not at any risk of being prosecuted. “Well, I did nothing wrong, so I don’t see that,” he said, “I did absolutely nothing wrong. I had a perfect phone call in Georgia, so I’m not concerned with it.” He was also not concerned with inquiries by Tish James, he said, referring to her as “a racist attorney general in New York.”
Definitely, and if you’re outside and there’s a bear charging at you, just close your eyes and you’ll be fine, the bear won’t know where you are.
That term “perfect phone call” – he resorts to that all too frequently.
In this case, to defend trying to intimidate a Secretary of State to change the votes. In a prior case, to defend trying to leverage a head of state to investigate the son of a political rivan.
I don’t know that “perfect phone calls” are. Grammar, sound quality, no coughs in the background, no “umms” or sort ofs or you-knows?
The “perfect phone call” is just part of his standard bombast, with a dose of media manipulation built in.
The bombast: Trump’s supporters love that he exudes confidence and bragadoccio no matter what he’s facing. Even when it transparently wasn’t a “perfect phone call,” that’s just all the more reason they like him; he’s flat-out lying to “the libs” and daring them to do something about it. Back during his pre-political real estate promoter days, the media and huge sections of the public ate it up. Good ol’ Trump, he’s a bit absurd, but ya gotta admire his chutzpah, amiright?
The media manipulation part: Trump knows that if you’re being attacked for something you did, and you say that it was fine/acceptable/permissible/ok/not a big deal, the “middle ground” that the media will instinctively reach for is “well, maybe it’s not as bad as the critics say, but it is somewhat bad.” See, e.g., Hillary’s emails. Her critics said “lock her up,” her defense was “I more or less conformed to established protocols,” so the “neutral” position became Jim Comey’s “well, it wasn’t criminal, but it was very very very bad!”
So Trump says “it was a perfect phone call,” and now the middle position between that and “it was criminal/impeachable” becomes “well, it certainly wasn’t perfect, but not criminal/impeachable either, it was ok.”
And in the case of the call to Raffensperger we all got to hear it, so we know how very not-perfect it was.