Guest post: A community is born
Guest post by Jon Gallant
Our increasingly woke life in the arts and sciences and in the groves of academe includes sanctification of membership (or claimed membership) in certain favored sub-populations. In New Zealand, for one example, the Aukland artist Peter Robinson has built his career half-seriously as a Maori artist—out of a Maori inheritance of 3.125%, a single great-great-great-grandparent. At the University of Saskatchewan, Prof. Carrie Bourassa (who sometimes presented herself as “Morning Star Bear”) has become an influential figure in “indigenous” Canada, based on a Metis grandfather who had, it turns out, as much reality as the tooth fairy, Santa Claus, and Buraq, Mohammed’s flying horse. I propose to follow a similar path, but one a little more realistic than that used by Professor Morning Star Bear.
Most European members of the Homo sapiens species, which includes me, have in their genomes between 1.5% and 3.5% sequences that come from the sub-species of Homo neanderthalensis. This is roughly comparable to Peter Robinson’s Maori inheritance, and much more than the 0.00% Metis ancestry enjoyed by Professor Bear.
Therefore, I hereby identify myself a member of the Neanderthal Community. We have been oppressed and “othered” by the dominant group for too long! Henceforth, I expect at all times to be addressed by the Neanderthal personal pronouns ᚼᛅᛚᛚᚬ and ᛘᛁᛏᚴᛅᚱ, and I will complain to the HR Office about any failure to do so. I will lodge complaints in the DEI Office about every use of “Neanderthal” as noun or adjective to mean backward: this flagrant microaggression marginalizes the Neanderthal part of my genome, and makes it feel unsafe.
Needless to say, we need the formation of a Neanderthal “affinity group” at the university, where that part of our genomes can get together to compare grievances and micro-grievances. I look forward to the insertion of Neanderthal wisdom into every academic curriculum, especially in STEM fields where the Neanderthal Way of Knowing is most urgently needed. Since Neanderthal sequences constitute only a fraction of its bearers’ genomes, our abbreviation is ΦN and should be thus abbreviated in the relevant acronyms, such as BIPOC ΦN and LGBTQIX+ ΦN.
Finally, I will petition my own University to establish a program in Neanderthal Studies. Or rather, a full department, a Center, and a scholarly journal for research in Critical Neanderthal Studies. An ample budget for the department and the Center and the journal will be required, but we can be sure the university administration will find the cash. Yours in ᛗᛁᛞᚷᚨᚱᛞ, Jon Gallant (at least 3.125% Neanderthal)
After seeing reflections of this news on our walls, we Troglodytes wish you well as you bravely pave the way for others of our kind to join in the spectacular new world of identity politics! :D
Geico calling: Would you consider having our name on your football stadium?
I share the implied skepticism of “authenticity” supplied by ancestry rather than, oh, knowledge and expertise and experience, perhaps? There are many examples in the US, one of which is based on Native American ancestry, but that isn’t the only one; ancestry seems to come up when people talk about “authentic” food, for instance. (Give me Julia Child over someone who barely cooks but was born and grew up in France.) “Authenticity” in general is overrated anyway.
Sign me up! I’ve got 2% Neanderthal genes, according to Ancestry, and I’ve been positively yearning for some way to identify myself as being oppressed and special without coloring my hair purple like Laurie Penny (because I can’t, because I’m bald)! SUPPORT YOUR ΦN KINFOLK!
Now all we need is a flag. (Can Bigfoot be on it?)
Sign me up!
What about those of us with more Denisovan heritage than Neanderthal? I have no proof that this is true in my case, but it feels like the truth to me, therefore it is my truth. This now entitles me to declare as fact my feelings about Denisovan culture. You have already genocided us in the past, do not double genocide us by denying my truth.
Also, pass some of that funding over or you are also our oppressor.
@4 oh oh oh, and since red hair is a Neanderthal trait, anyone who dyes their hair red or reddish/purple is attempting to appropriate Neanderthal oppression. And that’s bad, as we know.
I was once a great knucklewalker, and used to do an acclaimed routine for a party trick. Jumping up onto furniture while grunting like a gorilla was a specialty.
But now I realise, thanks to this thread, that is was just me getting in touch with my Neanderthal ancestry. It was obviously speaking its mind, having its say, demanding recognition and inclusion and claiming its right to be heard.
I also used to have red hair. That should count for something. I still am a redhead, in part. Maybe that should be ‘on part’. But I won’t say what part.
I just want to point out that guest@6 is oppressin’ me.
If I were you I’d start cancelling Jean M. Auel and get The Clan of the Cave Bear removed from all library shelves and book stores. She did not identify as Neanderthal, and yet wrote a lot of romanticized yet insulting tripe about the Neanderthal. She shaped the knowledge of an entire generation of those who read really long popular over-hyped novels. One of the worst examples of cultural appropriations I’ve seen.
A Nepa! Neanderthal exclusionary popular author. Nepas are the worst.
Thanks for the greetings from our Denisovan genome cousins. We will of course ask the university to set up a separate Denisovan “affinity group”, as well as another for any little people who identify with bits of their genome from Homo floresiensis. These groups will supplement the multiple ones the university already sponsors.
Soon there will be more affinity groups than there are students and faculty! Utopia!
I just don’t think you guys are taking this seriously. Shocked! Shocked I say!
Well, not that shocked.