Et tu Forbes?
Here I was thinking Forbes was a conservative sedate business magazine but I find it’s running a classic dopy childish “Rowling is the devil” piece:
JK Rowling, author of the Harry Potter series, has become the most prominent face and voice in the world of anti-trans rhetoric, where she spends all day on Twitter sparring with critics and activists.
No she doesn’t. Of course she doesn’t. She’s a very busy human. She writes books, lots of them; she writes fast but not that fast – she can’t possibly spend all day on Twitter and also write a long novel every few months. Plus she does other things, like philanthropy. You’d expect that kind of sloppy casual lying in a tweet, but in a Forbes article? They let angry teenagers write their stuff?
Now, she’s gone after a prominent trans gamer for her thoughts on whether or not supporting an upcoming Harry Potter project like Hogwarts Legacy, the sprawling video game, is harmful because of this author’s views.
Has to be an angry teenager – the writing is so bad. Whose thoughts? (A man’s, actually, the man who got a day’s fame because Rowling mentioned him.) Which author?
Then the hapless teenager lets slip that he missed Rowling’s sarcasm.
Earl’s argument was actually that no you don’t need to burn the books or movies you already own, that may have comforted you long before Rowling’s recent turn, but now, buying something new like Hogwarts Legacy is knowingly supporting her directly
Yes she knows, that was her point; she’s making fun of Jessie Gender’s hand-wringing advice that it’s ok to keep the contaminating JKR books on your shelves under a few stringent conditions. It’s called sarcasm. Too sophisticated for Forbes?
The author is described as a “senior contributor,” so may actually be an adult in chronological terms.
I looked him up. He writes about video games and television, and has written books about “Near-future sci-fi gladiatorial combat.”
So OK I think it’s safe to assume he’s a case of arrested development.
Very arrested development, Lady Mondegreen. He has the understanding of a semi-literate 10-year-old. I dread to think what his ‘novels’ are like, and I dread to think of the intellectual capacities of the editors at Forbes – a publication which is, I think, not quite so ‘staid’ as Ophelia suggests, since it happily, and cravenly, produces Youtube videos of righteous Republican politicians laying into Dr Fauci, Biden appointees to the Supreme Court and other positions, and others. Stay on the side of the lunatics & Trumpians until finally their support dwindles away seems to be the cynical Forbes strategy, and then shift position and pretend that the new position was really the position all along.
The printed Forbes Magazine was a conservative sedate business magazine (for all I know it still is) but Forbes Online is a weird, tacky content farm which is somehow still able to capitalise on the old reputation and brand of Forbes Magazine.
https://www.niemanlab.org/2022/02/an-incomplete-history-of-forbes-com-as-a-platform-for-scams-grift-and-bad-journalism/
Since when has “don’t buy this videogame” ever worked? Endless mediocrities get produced, stuff launches in an unfinished state with astonishing regularity, and yet still the pre-orders come in…
The kid is a fool…
#Gamergate ver 2.0
I for one prefer the Gamergaters… Look at who the prominent anti-Gamergaters turned out to be…