Easy for some
Just handing away our rights as if they were his to hand away.
Oh just stop right there. That’s cheating. It’s not “a question” whether housing trans women is more like housing lesbians or housing men, obviously, because trans women are men. Housing trans women is identical to housing men because both trans women and men are men. He doesn’t need evidence to prove that because it’s true by definition. Housing men is like housing men; housing men is not like housing lesbians.
He tries to pretend that’s not true by calling men “cis men” but that’s a cheat. “Cis” is a word that’s used to deflect perception of cheating of this kind.
As with sports, defenders of the dogma say oh but they’re on estrogen, they’re not the same as men, but that’s horseshit. 1. most are not on estrogen and 2. even with estrogen the advantages remain huge.
He just thinks women’s safety doesn’t matter. It’s maddening.
There is no such step. Trans women are men. You might as well say “you missed a step where you prove that trans women act the same as flibberty men.”
Yes it’s all just a big joke.
Considering the fact that a lot of the “transwomen” prisoners are convicted rapists ….
Just a minute, Buster. The burden of proof here is on the one claiming that some males are less likely to assault women than other males. (And while you’re at it, see if you can show that these special males are not bigger and stronger than females.)
This highlights the problem we’re dealing with: the gender identity movement has got people accepting their implied premises without question.
evidece? got it!
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016885
“regarding any crime, male-to-females had a significantly increased risk for crime compared to female controls (aHR 6.6; 95% CI 4.1–10.8) but not compared to males (aHR 0.8; 95% CI 0.5–1.2). This indicates that they retained a male pattern regarding criminality. The same was true regarding violent crime.”
So until someone produces proof that transwomen act the same as “cis” men, we are to accept without evidence that they don’t. Why? Because TWAW, of course. That’s where the mantra gets us. It allows them to pretend that saying “transwomen pose as much of a risk to women as men” is just as absurd as saying “women with freckles pose as much as a risk to other women as men”.
Most of the people so cavalier about this happen to be my fellow men. No skin in the game, no concern, lulzing their way through women’s rights as much as the Rush Limbaugh Dittoheads echoing the “feminazi” claim.
But, of course, they’re liberals because they support the rights of all women. And when you know you’re on the “right side of history,” listening to women is a waste of time.
A new rallying cry: “Transwomen are cis men”!
More and more these days, it seems like the correlation between “raging asshole” and “records a podcast every week” is closer to 1.0 than it’s ever been before.
It does kind of rely on an assumption that one is particularly charismatic or entertaining or otherwise worth listening to, since listening is so much slower than reading. Exceptions may apply.
“Transwo Men ARE Men – it’s right there in the name!”
I hereby nominate tigger_the_wing@9 for the “wins the Internet” award for January 2, 2022.
I’ll second it when I can breathe again, I’m laughing too much. Good one.
James Garnett @ #10
Snoopy is blushing.