Compete or include; you can’t do both
About that World Athletics item – Sean Ingle yesterday:
The World Athletics president, Sebastian Coe, has hailed swimming’s decision to ban transgender women from elite female competition as in “the best interests of its sport” – and hinted that track and field could soon follow suit.
If it’s in the best interests of one sport it’s surely in the best interests of all of them.
Lord Coe was in Budapest on Sunday as swimming’s governing body, Fina, voted to bar from women’s events trans athletes who have experienced any part of male puberty. Within 24 hours he announced that the World Athletics council would also be reviewing its transgender and DSD (differences in sex development) athletes policies at the end of the year.
Good. Bring on the wave.
“My responsibility is to protect the integrity of women’s sport. We take that very seriously and, if it means that we have to make adjustments to protocols going forward, we will,” Coe said. “And I’ve always made it clear: if we ever get pushed into a corner to that point where we’re making a judgment about fairness or inclusion, I will always fall down on the side of fairness.”
Which seems so obvious. Sport is inherently not about some kind of blanket inclusion, because it involves competition. Physical activities can be inclusive, but competitions can’t be.
I think the argument I am starting to find the most infuriating is the ‘transgender women should be allowed to compete in women’s sport because it is wrong to police women’s bodies’ line.
https://www.cbc.ca/sports/fina-transgender-swim-opinion-shireen-ahmed-1.6495697