Now you’re corrected
I get the feeling the venom is getting more venomous.
I guess that’s the “d’Amour” part? Very lovey-dovey I must say.
Anyway Philip Pullman approves of it.
Feminist women are cunts, and Philip Pullman tells us to go to hell if we object to his endorsement of that view. Strange times.
Updating: It’s even worse than that.
Oh, yes, that’s fine then. Call us cunts all day long if you think we’re “transphobes” i.e. women who don’t agree that men who call themselves women are women. Cunts are very filthy disgusting things after all, which is why men are so much better at being women than women are.
Ironic, given that he resigned as president of the Society of Authors because–
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-60873393
Go to hell then, Sir Phillip.
“Mitten” is most definitely NOT a woman. “Mitten” is a man in womanface.
Unlike JKR’s alleged “transphobia”, Phillip Pullman’s contempt for women requires no secret decoder ring to detect. Thanks for the clarity, Phillip.
And, go to hell.
As a giraffe, I find this all most confusing.
But then again, and before it all gets too serious:
Hope this helps.
.
https://bust.com/arts/196838-baubo-ancient-vagina-goddess.html
“The people being called that word were specifically transphobes.”
Not much of a defence, given how freely that label is given. All it takes is “there are two sexes” in some circles.
I’m confused. I’ve been repeatedly assured by Ricky Gervais that “c*nt” is not a sexist word at all. It’s an ancient Scots word for “mate.”
Haven’t we all.
Pullman – he is a curious man. I admired the first two volumes of ‘His Dark Materials’ trilogy (not the last), and actually met him once: I was back in England (I live in Japan) and went into a bookshop in Berkshire where it turned out that he was signing copies of his latest publication, so I bought a copy for the sons of some friends of mine in Japan and got him to sign it. We chatted about Milton, whom we both admire, and at the time I liked him. But there is a strong streak of didacticism in the man, as well as what seems to be a desire to be on the ‘cutting edge’ of every fashionable idea, so long as it seems to be sufficiently on the more ridiculous left of the political spectrum (to the extent that one wonders whether he is doing this out of sincere belief or out of a cynical desire to appeal to a certain readership), and a desire to be some sort of public intellectual. All of which combined ruins his latest books, in my judgement. The desire to keep up with the latest drives for some sort of indiscriminate ‘liberation’ means that he is no longer writing out of some deep place, but has become a sort of shallow illustrator of popular (among certain people) trends..
Mike@7, haven’t you heard? Its meaning exists on a spectrum!
@james – I have a pun in mind related to “No it ain’t,” but I’ll just leave it out in this forum. I think only Kristen Schaal could make it work.