Who are the voices?
Oh dear. That would be all the feminist women he’s blocked.
What a question from a guy who is so determined to ostracize and silence women who defend our own boundaries and our very definition. He wants to amplify our voices now after all these years of obsessive de-amplification? And he finds it obvious that he’s talking exclusively about women?
Better late than never I suppose, But like all such, he needs taking with a pinch or two of salt. No, make that shovelfuls.
Well no, he still doesn’t want to hear from certain women; he’ll only accept those that agree with him that a woman is anyone that declares themselves a woman.
Of course we all know what Jones himself would say: That he has been standing up for the most marginalized and oppressed group of “women” against hateful bigots who deny their basic human rights out of pure malevolence and evil for evil’s sake. Once again we run into the distinction between using the same words and talking about the same things (i.e. the “bad pun” problem). There are no feminist brownie points for acknowledging the need to amplify the voices of “women” if you have re-defined “women” to mean a completely different group of people, as you have to do to make the word apply to biological males.