What it feels like
Chelsea Mitchell on what fun it was having to compete against two boys in her sport:
It’s February 2020. I’m crouched at the starting line of the high school girls’ 55-meter indoor race. This should be one of the best days of my life. I’m running in the state championship, and I’m ranked the fastest high school female in the 55-meter dash in the state. I should be feeling confident. I should know that I have a strong shot at winning.
Instead, all I can think about is how all my training, everything I’ve done to maximize my performance, might not be enough, simply because there’s a runner on the line with an enormous physical advantage: a male body.
I won that race, and I’m grateful. But time after time, I have lost. I’ve lost four women’s state championship titles, two all-New England awards, and numerous other spots on the podium to male runners. I was bumped to third place in the 55-meter dash in 2019, behind two male runners. With every loss, it gets harder and harder to try again.
That’s a devastating experience. It tells me that I’m not good enough; that my body isn’t good enough; and that no matter how hard I work, I am unlikely to succeed, because I’m a woman.
That’s why she filed a lawsuit along with three other women against the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference (CIAC).
The CIAC allows biological males to compete in girls’ and women’s sports. As a result, two males began racing in girls’ track in 2017. In the 2017, 2018, and 2019 seasons alone, these males took 15 women’s state track championship titles (titles held in 2016 by nine different girls) and more than 85 opportunities to participate in higher level competitions that belonged to female track athletes.
Everybody used to know this was unfair.
But Connecticut officials are determined to ignore the obvious. And unfortunately, a federal district court recently dismissed our case. The court’s decision to do so tells women and girls that their feelings and opportunities don’t matter, and that they can’t expect anyone to stand up for their dignity and their rights.
…
It’s discouraging that the federal district court has decided that these experiences — these lost opportunities — simply don’t matter.But I’m not beaten yet. And neither are my fellow female athletes.
Through our ADF attorneys, my fellow athletes and I are appealing the federal district court’s ruling. We’re taking our case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, where we are going to ask once again for the court to recognize our right to fair competition — a right that Title IX has promised to girls and women for 50 years. And we’re fighting not just for ourselves, but for all female athletes.
Fingers crossed.
Keith Berrouet was the champion on the boys side, with a time of 6.42. Why shouldn’t he compete on the girls side?
Chelsea Mitchell’s winning time was 7.15. She would not have made the finals on the boys side. All of the boys in the preliminary race were faster than her best time, her winning time. The last-place boy ran 6.86.
Why is it OK for a boy to run in the girls race solely by claiming to be girl? What’s the point of having a girls race if boys can run in it? First they allow boys with certain testosterone levels, then they allow boys base on self-ID, why not drop the self-ID requirement and let any boy compete in the girls race?
There are lots and lots of athletes who have been punished or banned for using performance-enhancing drugs. Only a few of them have parlayed their drug use into actual top-level victories. An advantage is not a guarantee. But being male in the “girls” competition is a huge advantage indeed.