When I say that we’re not doing enough to “challenge men for violence against women & girls,” am I to say we’re not doing enough to “challenge people for violence against people?” I will not do that It doesn’t put the blame where it belongs It doesn’t protect those most at risk
This is probably the least obnoxious use of ‘people-for-women’ I’ve seen here, honestly; more of a bit of shit icing on the turd cake than anything else, mainly because I haven’t heard of any gendered aspects to the vaccination clashes in the first place.
“To challenge cismen for violence against non-men.”
There. Now THAT’S inclusive.
…What?
This is probably the least obnoxious use of ‘people-for-women’ I’ve seen here, honestly; more of a bit of shit icing on the turd cake than anything else, mainly because I haven’t heard of any gendered aspects to the vaccination clashes in the first place.