Sally versus the hags
Ah yes, this is very intelligent.
Yes indeed, feminism is just so old-fashioned, so yesterday, so uncool. The passage of time negates everything we knew and we have to start entirely over every…ten years? Thirty? You’ll notice her arithmetic isn’t great, since she thinks 2021 is “over 2 decades” past 1988. But anyway point is, if it’s one or two or three decades old it’s wrong. It’s wrong, it’s lame, it’s uncool. Those stupid women who kicked over the traces in 1968 and after were right then, but time passed and so they became wrong. Now it’s now, and we have to believe the New Truths, or be sneered at by Sally Hines.
What a fucking twerp she is.
1988 was a primitive era when we didn’t know that little boys who like pink need to be put on puberty blockers until they can figure out if they’re male or female. A savage time before gender-fluid guys in dresses were making human rights cases out of not being able to work in rape crisis shelters.
Ah yes, I well remember those barbarous times of 1988. I have to confess my own wrong-think. I once believed that boys could like pink, or indeed any colour, and that if they wanted to wear clothes that were out there and not ‘mens’ attire, well good on them. Cuddly toys? Fine! Want to become a fashion designer, artist, or receptionist? Good on them. We can’t all kill a deer with our bare hands and eat its raw heart while mining coal and welding a tank. Girls too. I once argued that girls could wear jeans, not wear make-up, drink beer (when old enough) and take their sexual pleasure where and with whatever (consenting) adult they like.
I was soooo wrong. Now I understand that everyone has to fit into two discrete boxes and behave accordingly, except for the lucky NB’s who can pick and choose on the day apparently.
GC feminists? Nah, misogyny. Have they forgotten the women holding “I can’t believe I still have to protest this shit” posters?