Non-men sex ed
Sex advice for lesbians! From an expert!
Defining “lesbian sex” is no easy feat. Most commonly, the phrase is used as a porn search term to help people find content featuring two (or more) cisgender women.
But this is not an accurate conceptualization of lesbian sex. Why? Well, for starters, it suggests that only cis-gendered women get to participate in lesbian sex, which is untrue. Lesbian is not defined as cisgender women interested in cisgender women, but as non-man who loves, dates, and fuck other non-man.
Really??? I did not know that. I love learning new things. All this time I thought lesbian was defined as women attracted to women. I feel so stupid for not realizing it means non-men rather than women.
So any non-binary person, transwoman, agender, and a gender-expansive person who claims the label “lesbian” can have lesbian sex—not just cisgender women.
So there, cisgender bitch Karens, you evil greedy bitches trying to hog lesbian-being just for your bitch selves. Men can be lesbians!!!
Second, it implies that everyone engaging in certain sex acts or with certain bodies or gender(s) is a lesbian, which is inaccurate. Because again: The only thing that makes someone a lesbian is that they self-identify as lesbian.
Literally the only thing. 6’5″ Joe who weighs 300 pounds and cuts down trees for a living is a lesbian if he says he is.
Someone who is bisexual, omnisexual, heterosexual, asexual, or of any other sexuality, could enjoy, in theory, sex acts labeled “lesbian sex acts.”
If an asexual person enjoys sex acts, how is that person asexual? I want to believe, but some of this is a little confusing.
For the purposes of this article, we are defining “lesbian sex” as sex between two (or more) non-men of any sexual orientation exploring their bodies together for the sake of pleasure.
Why non-men as opposed to women?
I wonder if the author, Gabrielle Kassel, has any sex advice for non-women.
I shall fellate my husband’s lesbian cock in honor of our newfound lesbianism.–Mike
You are now sex edumacated.
So lesbian = Unmensch who sleeps with other Unmenschen?
So all animals are lesbian? And when the vacuum cleaner gets it on with the dishwasher, that’s lesbian sex?
I was hoping this was a parody, but…it appears not to be.
I already had suspicions about the dishwasher, now I’m considering them confirmed.
I never realized just how shameless those appliances were until I started working at home.
So the constant tangling of my computer mouse with my camera bag strap means my mouse is engaging in lesbian sex with my camera? I never suspected….
It explains…. a lot, actually. It explains more and more the more I think about it.
And now I can’t stop thinking about it :(
latslot: Do you happen to be a fundamentalist Baptist minister. They seem to have a similar problem with “thinking about it” too much?
Is this another one of those things where “Pornhub knows what a lesbian is…” Or “The state of Texas knows what a woman is…” Why don’t you?
This sort of framing demonstrates how backwards this woke bullshit really is. Women have been excluded from an equal share of rights for… basically all of human history, and have only really made strides since modern feminism arose in the late 1800s. But now the performative edge of the left is eroding this, openly relegating women back to mere non-men, as opposed to being a thing in their own right. Unsurprisingly, this is encouraged by men that want to erode the concept of women-only spaces.
Imagine the same thing happening with race rather than sex: rather than changing women to non-men, we turn black people to non-white people. No one would get away with doing that, but its fine with women because … reasons.
For the eleventy-first time: categories are not social clubs. A triangle doesn’t “get” to be a triangle or a polygon. It simply meets the definitions and thus is a triangle and a polygon. If you get to have sex with someone, and both of you are female, then you are participating in sex that is lesbian, because it meets the definition of lesbian sex. The only gatekeeping is of your partner’s privates, not of the terminology involved.
Get the fvck outta here with your absurd, participation-trophy mentality.
Yeah, the “get to” construction seems so childish, doesn’t it? “Why does Annie get to ride in the front?” “Why does Joe get to stay up late?” “Why does Sally get to have lesbian sex?” “It’s not faaaaaiiiiiiirrrrrrrrr!!! “
“Why are you being so meeeeeean?”
“Mommy, they won’t let me pay with their toys!”
“WAAAAAAA!”
Essentially.
It’s actually rather refreshing when their phrasing is so obviously petulant.