No shows
Lots of fizzled protests out there.
Police were on high alert in state capitals around the U.S. Sunday, after warnings that pro-Trump extremists might attempt to storm legislatures similar to the assault on the U.S. Capitol last week. But at many statehouses and capitols, security and the media outnumbered protesters.
One, Trump wasn’t there. Two, getting arrested probably doesn’t look so attractive any more. Three…ohIdon’tknow, whohastheenergy.
In Denver, the Colorado Capitol’s lower windows were covered in anticipation of possible unrest — but hardly anyone showed up on Sunday. “I’m really surprised. I figured there’d be more than this,” a supporter of President Trump told Colorado Public Radio.
Forget it, Jake, it’s Chinatown.
In Lansing, where protesters swarmed Michigan’s Capitol building last May and a plot against the governor was uncovered in recent months, Sunday’s protest was deemed “eclectic, but small and dull” by Michigan Radio. Events remained quiet, despite some demonstrators bringing their guns to the protest.
…
There was “relative quiet at the Oregon State Capitol,” according to Oregon Public Broadcasting, despite the arrival of a small group of armed demonstrators. The group included members of the extremist “boogaloos” movement, who are known for advocating for a new civil war.
But advocating for a new civil war goes a little flat when hardly anybody shows up for the advocamations.
“A couple dozen armed demonstrators gathered at the Texas Capitol on Sunday,” member station KUT reports, adding that the group said they had come to spread a “message of individual liberty.” But not many people were around to hear it, as the grounds were closed.
Individual liberty, man. They stayed home. Those beers aren’t going to drink themselves.
In Florida, the Capitol in Tallahassee was mainly populated by a range of law enforcement agencies and journalists, according to member station WFSU — which reports a man as he rode by on a bicycle called out, “It’s a beautiful day! Nothing happening here!”
There are a number of possible explanations for the smaller than expected protests – including that some right-wing activists are reluctant to congregate at a time when police are looking for any sign of trouble and the FBI is vigorously seeking people to face charges related to the assault in Washington.
Yes but it’s seriously also that Trump was not there, so 1. he was not a draw, and 2. he did not whip them into a rabid frenzy by screaming at them through a microphone.
And so then the crowd didn’t form so there wasn’t the crowd energy to feed off. Protests and rallies always carry that risk with them, including the ones with benign motivations and goals. I think it’s quite possible that some of the people who took part are now feeling terrible about it, and wondering what the hell they were thinking.
What if they gave a war and no one came?
In Lincoln, there was specifically a gun protest planned, and our town had a Trump train planned. Lincoln was prepared for the worst, but like the others, it was very anticlimactic. Thank…whatever force in the universe made these people lackluster when not whipped up by their celebrity deity.
Yeah. If you want to get all jazzed up for your favorite celebrity you actually have to have the celebrity or it’s just another depressing day of deluded self importance.
Seeing Trump turn his back on the Washington rioters after inciting them to insurrection might have helped cool their ardour, and the publicity about how well-defended all of the state houses would have put many off. Funny how the knowledge they’d be outnumbered by a better-armed opposition tends to deter the armchair warriors.
And no Twitter megaphone, either.
Governance by Twitter. What a horrible experiment.
“Advocating for a new civil war” makes it sound absurdly polite.
Catwhisperer, I’ve always thought that ‘civil war’ itself sounds like a pleasant way of doing battle.
Well one wouldn’t want to get involved in an ill-mannered war. Rather bad form, I should say.