Intensely personal
A federal appeals court rescues our precious freedom to spread lethal diseases.
A federal appeals court has kept its block in place against a federal mandate that all large employers require their workers to get vaccinated against the coronavirus or submit to weekly testing starting in January, declaring that the rule “grossly exceeds” the authority of the occupational safety agency that issued it.
Because it’s not occupational safety to be able to go to work without risking death by Covid? Sounds like occupational safety to me. Working with assholes can be very unsafe indeed.
“From economic uncertainty to workplace strife, the mere specter of the mandate has contributed to untold economic upheaval in recent months,” Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote.
He added: “Of course, the principles at stake when it comes to the mandate are not reducible to dollars and cents. The public interest is also served by maintaining our constitutional structure and maintaining the liberty of individuals to make intensely personal decisions according to their own convictions — even, or perhaps particularly, when those decisions frustrate government officials.”
What’s so “intensely personal” about it? Yes, it’s a needle in the personal arm, but lots of things impinge on our bodies and we don’t think of them as “intensely personal.” Our feet make contact with the sidewalk; we breathe the public air along with everyone else; we go into buildings that contain other people. It’s not particularly “personal” that I can see, and it’s definitely not exclusively personal. That’s the whole point: it’s about everyone. We protect others as well as ourselves by getting it, and they do the same. The protection is mutual. It’s a public and reciprocal matter much more than it’s a personal one.
Maybe he means it’s “intensely personal” because it rests on a belief – a wrong, stupid, unreasonable belief. Hey, that sounds like religion! Religion is “intensely personal” (as well as very public and as mandatory as we can make it), so refusing to get vaccinated must be too. You can’t make me get vaccinated because I have an intensely personal wrong belief about vaccinations, so there.
In a filing asking the Fifth Circuit to withdraw its stay this week, the Justice Department argued that requiring large employers to force their workers to get vaccinated or submit to weekly testing was well within the authority granted by Congress to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or OSHA. It also said blocking the mandate would have dire consequences.
Keeping the mandate from coming into effect “would likely cost dozens or even hundreds of lives per day, in addition to large numbers of hospitalizations, other serious health effects and tremendous costs,” the Justice Department said in its filing. “That is a confluence of harms of the highest order.”
Meh, said the three Republican judges. We don’t care.
What’s the objection to weekly testing for people who for whatever reason don’t want to get vaccinated?
As opposed to the minor inconveniences brought about by half a million deaths in a year as a result of this pesky little virus? And the “mere specter of the mandate” being referred to includes batshit-crazy “fears” of Government Mind Control and Tracking, Big Pharma spreading the disease (which I thought didn’t exist!) through the vaccines, or the vaccines mutating our DNA. Stop signs and traffic lights interfere with “freedom” too, but I can’t imagine much judicial support for opposing them. I can’t imagine these judges presenting themselves for medical procedures perfomed by people whose only expertise comes from fifteen minutes of “research” on Youtube, yet they are expecting the rest of the population to submit to exactly that in striking down vaccine mandates.
Tinfoil hats are fine, but masks are Tyranny.
YNnB, you beat me to it. Stop signs interfere with my personal liberty to keep my car moving no matter what the consequences. Speed limits interfere with my personal liberty to drive a hundred miles an hour even when the car in front of me is only going fifty. School zones interfere with my personal liberty to risk the lives of school children trying to cross the street. Public obscenity laws interfere with my personal liberty to walk down the street nude (which would be particularly desirable today, when it is about 28 Fahrenheit here). Property laws interfere with my personal freedom to remove property from my neighbor’s garage without his permission, thereby saving myself time and money by not having to drive to the store to purchase it (and saving the emissions of my car driving there, too! Win-win!).
I haven’t seen the republican judges speak out about veggie libel laws, which make it unlawful to be a food critic in thirteen states…and the lawsuits can be brought in one of those states even if you don’t live there. Funny thing…the thirteen states are republican dominated. Go figure.
I’m sorry, but this shit fucks with the free market in so many ways. Continued poor vaccination rates can be directly tied to extremely limited international travel which completely dicks a host of industries (especially my own; we make aircraft parts).
“veggie libel laws, which make it unlawful to be a food critic in thirteen states”
Whaaaaaaat??? Tell us more!
Wikipedia:
Food and wine.com:
I talk about these in class; it’s another group of cases of SLAPPs.
Good god.
https://www.acluohio.org/en/modern-day-slapp-suits
I need to look into this.
There is a long history in the United States of the gov’t imposing quite strict and intrusive public health laws regulations, and of the courts upholding these laws and regs on a very broad view that the need to protect society must override all manner of individual rights and freedoms. The legal reasoning is very specifically that the exercise of a right must not lead to the collapse of the society that grants that right.
It is hard to see the sudden squeamishness of the federal courts over vaccine requirements as other than politically motivated.
Well when you’ve got activist judges appointed by a degenerated FedSoc under a criminal president you’ve got to expect this kind of shit.
Hopefully SCOTUS decides to put the kibosh on this sort of thing; other than Thomas, Alito, and maybe Barrett I don’t see why they’d be ideologically committed to anti-vaxxing.