Well, that’s something. I still have to wonder where, on the ‘hate crime’ scale, the police will place that threat; compared to, say, re-tweeting a photograph of a ribbon on a fence…
I wasn’t aware of the initial response, the “grave error of judgement”, that has now led to the resignation of a staff member. I am curious what happened, but I am impressed that the school described it as they did, did not extrapolate, and is not pushing further. There are a lot of “heat of the moment” responses, positive and negative, to events, and they are sometimes disproportionate.
I wasn’t aware of the initial response, the “grave error of judgement”, that has now led to the resignation of a staff member. I am curious what happened, but I am impressed that the school described it as they did, did not extrapolate, and is not pushing further.
Here’s a link to a screenshot of the university’s intitial response to the Terf Hunter who’s been suspended. I hope expulsion follows.
Well, that’s something. I still have to wonder where, on the ‘hate crime’ scale, the police will place that threat; compared to, say, re-tweeting a photograph of a ribbon on a fence…
I wonder what Stonewall will have to say about this. Brunel will surely lose woke points.
I’m sure it won’t go well for them. They’ve “excluded” the student. That’s tantamount to genocide right there.
I wasn’t aware of the initial response, the “grave error of judgement”, that has now led to the resignation of a staff member. I am curious what happened, but I am impressed that the school described it as they did, did not extrapolate, and is not pushing further. There are a lot of “heat of the moment” responses, positive and negative, to events, and they are sometimes disproportionate.
Here’s a link to a screenshot of the university’s intitial response to the Terf Hunter who’s been suspended. I hope expulsion follows.
https://mobile.twitter.com/lascapigliata8/status/1400792096504700931/photo/1