I’m not seeing the confidence building part

How to do politics that is serious and honest:

Starting with honest – it’s not honest to say “the anti-trans movement” when he’s talking about Maya and the ruling. It’s not “anti-trans” to defend women’s rights, even when we are defending them in the face of actions and policies promoted by some trans activists.

Also, yes it is about trying to humiliate a person, when he singles Maya out for abuse and lies – when he calls her names and claims she’s doing things she’s not doing. Of course it is. His “honest” is not honest at all.

And then there’s the string of stupid abusive epithets for three prominent gender critics. That’s neither honest nor serious.

He’s very heads I win tails you lose, which is also not my idea of honest.

No, it’s the other way around. Gender critical describes our view of gender, and anti-trans is just an abusive lie. We’re opposed to the magical new dogma that says men turn into women by saying they are women; that doesn’t make us “anti-trans.”

https://twitter.com/Steph__Wilkins/status/1403638821619703811

I take issue with its use because it’s inaccurate, and malicious, and coming from a grown-ass barrister who says it and adds a lol.

14 Responses to “I’m not seeing the confidence building part”