The TiMs are not victims (at least not of feminist women) and they are not women. I treat women like they are women. I do not believe men are women, just because they put on a dress and lipstick and let their hair grow long (or get it permed).
“At least [rapists] treat their victims, without prejudice, as women.” So “treated as women” = “raped”? And “without prejudice” = “raped both women and men-who-claim-to-be-women”? I wonder if he’s also thinking of men who rape men, such as notoriously happens in men’s prisons; are those men being “treated as women”? I guess he never considered this “treatment” as prejudicial against women? He’s apparently only concerned with treating men-who-claim-to-be-women the same as women, as bad as that might be.
I am for some reason reminded of a Hebrew School teacher I had. She spoke of Jewish people who tried to escape being terrorized or murdered by the Nazis by changing names and religion. The Nazis would seek out such people and take them away. The teacher said, paraphrased, “The one good thing Hitler did, he didn’t allow these people to escape their heritage; he reminded them they were Jews! Yes, he reminded them they were Jews!” Yep, former Jews were treated, without prejudice, as Jews.
M.E.N. Pride of Manchester? Kind of gives the game away. The name Burns reminded me of Magdalen Berns
Talk about tone policing! Being polite is a better marker of social acceptability than rape? Wow. Plot. Lost.
The TiMs are not victims (at least not of feminist women) and they are not women. I treat women like they are women. I do not believe men are women, just because they put on a dress and lipstick and let their hair grow long (or get it permed).
“At least [rapists] treat their victims, without prejudice, as women.” So “treated as women” = “raped”? And “without prejudice” = “raped both women and men-who-claim-to-be-women”? I wonder if he’s also thinking of men who rape men, such as notoriously happens in men’s prisons; are those men being “treated as women”? I guess he never considered this “treatment” as prejudicial against women? He’s apparently only concerned with treating men-who-claim-to-be-women the same as women, as bad as that might be.
I am for some reason reminded of a Hebrew School teacher I had. She spoke of Jewish people who tried to escape being terrorized or murdered by the Nazis by changing names and religion. The Nazis would seek out such people and take them away. The teacher said, paraphrased, “The one good thing Hitler did, he didn’t allow these people to escape their heritage; he reminded them they were Jews! Yes, he reminded them they were Jews!” Yep, former Jews were treated, without prejudice, as Jews.