Beyond a joke
Jo Bartosch on the BBC’s Politics Live comedy hour yesterday:
The moment of hilarity arrived when Ellie Mae O’Hagan, director of the think-tank CLASS, was asked by presenter Jo Coburn about the definition of ‘woman’. In response she said: ‘You know, I actually don’t know why some people are women and some people are men.’
After claiming her view was shared by most women (though who knows if they were women), O’Hagan then said that those who claim to be able to tell a person’s sex are ‘liars’.
And that’s why the human race has proved unable to reproduce over the past 300,000 years.
O’Hagan’s nonsensical comments were made during the course of a wider discussion on gender self-identification with the Labour MP Rosie Duffield. Duffield has been targeted by trans-rights campaigners who want her kicked out of the Labour Party for daring to suggest that ‘only women have a cervix’. The threats she received for stating this fact have been so severe that, earlier this year, the police warned she was at risk if she attended the Labour Party conference.
But so what, right? She’s just a woman. As long as there are plenty of trans women attending, who cares?
During Politics Live, Duffield made the point that those who are vulnerable, the very people the left claims to care about, can’t afford such luxury beliefs as ‘transwomen are women’. After all, it isn’t professional leftist think-tankers like O’Hagan who are at risk of being locked in a cell with a convicted male rapist who identifies as a woman. No one can buy their way out of abuse, of course, but having money does mean you’re less likely to end up in either a domestic-violence refuge or in prison.
Money can buy a woman’s way out of abuse, if she lives long enough to put it to use. She can spend that money on a plane ticket to far far away.
While it might not be reported in the pages of the Guardian, according to the Crown Prosecution Service 436 ‘women’ were convicted of rape between 2012 and 2018. Given that, according to the law, rape is defined as a crime that can only be committed by a man using his penis, that means 436 male rapists have been recorded as female, because they feel they have a female gender identity. Despite this, O’Hagan still claimed that she ‘didn’t know [of] a single incident where a woman has been put in danger because of a trans person’.
She has no right to say that. A trans “woman” murdered a lesbian couple and their son in Oakland a few years ago, to name just one. If O’Hagan doesn’t know that she damn well ought to find out before pontificating on the subject.
Had O’Hagan bothered to speak to women in prison she might have come across the victims of transgender rapist Karen White. After he was incarcerated in a women-only prison, he went on to sexually assault female inmates.
I guess such things are beneath the notice of the O’Hagans of the world.
There’s an odor of putrefaction coming from that think tank, someone should let the poor dears out. :P
Then she’s been living under a rock, or she believes that any blemish of criminality automatically, and without exception retroactively renders any prior professed trans status null and void, reducing the guilty party to the state of cis-manhood. “No True Trans” much?
If TAs want to claim that self ID is sufficient to confer “womanhood” or “femaleness” on any given male, then we get to say that all of these perps claiming to be trans, are trans. After all, self ID is self ID, right? This is what we’ve been being browbeaten to accept. What was that slogan again? “Acceptance without exception.” Just because genderists are now embarassed by the prevalence of opportunistic predators suddenly discovering their “womanhood” just in time to be “trans-ferred” to women’s facilities, who are they to police these felons’ transness?
If the stiletto fits…
Someone needs to point her to the “This Never Happens” facebook page.