Be quiet and defer to the experts
This is a medical issue, a scientific issue, all these outsider non-medical people shouldn’t be talking about it because they don’t have the expertise. WPATH says so.
The United States Professional Association for Transgender Health (USPATH) and the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) stand behind the appropriate care of transgender and gender diverse youth, which includes, when indicated, the use of “puberty blockers” such as gonadotropin releasing hormone analogs and other medications to delay puberty, and, when indicated, the use of gender- affirming hormones such as estrogen or testosterone. Guidelines for the assessment of transgender and gender diverse youth, as well as for the use of pubertal delay and gender affirming hormone medications have been published by reputable professional bodies, including the Endocrine Society, the World Professional Association for Transgender Health, and the American Psychiatric Association.
USPATH and WPATH support scientific discussions on the use of pubertal delay and hormone therapy for transgender and gender diverse youth. We believe that such discussions should occur among experts and stakeholders in this area, based on scientific evidence, and in fora such as peer-reviewed journals or scientific conferences, and among colleagues and experts in the assessment and care of transgender and gender diverse youth. USPATH and WPATH oppose the use of the lay press, either impartial or of any political slant or viewpoint, as a forum for the scientific debate of these issues, or the politicization of these issues in any way
But wait. Yes we need medical expertise on medical issues – Anthony Fauci rather than Tucker Carlson, for instance. But there’s a step prior to that – a step where people decide what should be done about a psychological state currently called gender dysphoria. That step is not solely about medical expertise. Medical expertise can tell us what “pubertal delay” and “hormone therapy” will do, but it’s a much broader discussion that figures out whether anything should be done about gender dysphoria and whether or not the anything done should be medical as opposed to therapeutic or cognitive or social or an array of other approaches.
It’s not a purely medical judgement to say that puberty blockers will fix or alleviate the symptoms of gender dysphoria, because the category is broad and expansive and subjective.
In short the two groups with a vested interest in “treatment” of trans people have…a vested interest. They have a bias toward medical intervention, and there are other people and groups that have serious questions about whether medical intervention is always necessary, is ever necessary, does more good than harm, and so on. Those questions are not purely medical and cannot be closed to “the lay press” or the lay anyone else.
But it seems that they have used the lay press quite effectively to convince the public that refusing puberty blockers and cross-hormones is tantamount to conversion therapy, the result of which denial will surely end in tears, sorrow, and suicide. If only affirmative care is provided to those who question their sex vis “gender identity,” how can anyone determine whether medical interventoin is indicated. It seems always to be indicated.
Well it doesn’t count when they do it, only when we do.
The scientific medical community can’t (or won’t) do proper controlled studies.
Take a large group of preteens medically diagnosed with gender dysphoria who all wish to transition. 100, say.
Randomly assign 50 to puberty blockers, followed by cross-sex hormones upon request (they all request it.) The other 50 is the control group and receives only counseling and medical support for the gender dysphoria.
Evaluate them at 18, 25, and 30. Compare and contrast the groups.
This will never happen as long as the conviction that transition is absolutely necessary for mental and physical health is still prevalent. Affirmation-Only advocates would compare this study to refusing care to a “control group” of cancer patients. Tuskegee would be brought up. Not happening.
When the Dutch first introduced puberty blockers they did so in order to weed out the kids who would desist. They knew it was a substantial percentage, but there was no way to tell which individuals would. Turned out there was no weeding. Puberty blockers work to confirm the desire to transition.
And they talk like the science is settled. There are a lot of scientists (biologists, even) who wouldn’t agree with them, and who do not actually think every age group is a separate gender. In short, they are selectively representing the science (not unusual with journalists, I realize, but a health organization should be more careful). Also, appropriate care…ah, yes. Appropriate. For what? For affirming a delusion. For mutilating a child. For snatching women’s rights away just as we are beginning to have them.
Abigail Shrier’s interview of two gender clinic doctors includes the woman who is slated to lead WPATH in 2022. The two now disagree with the use of puberty blockade in children,, and they talk about how dissenting opinion is stifled within the organization.
https://bariweiss.substack.com/p/top-trans-doctors-blow-the-whistle
The words ‘when indicated ‘ are doing a lot of heavy lifting there. Pretty much all of it really. Does when indicated equate to those who have received extensive counselling to resolve other mental health issues, to deal with social or abuse issues, stress about societal expectations? Or does it mean every single kid who comes in the door worried about their identity gets the treatment? There’s medical treatment and then there’s ethics.because you can, doesn’t mean you always should.
One thing that’s implied in your comment about vested interests, but that stands bringing out fully is precisely that WPATH isn’t disinterested, because a medic wouldn’t join WPATH unless they were basically at least sympathetic to genderwoo – and probably more than sympathetic. Absent that, there’d be no more incentive to join than there would be for an atheist to join, say, the Christian Medical Fellowship.
So it’s self-selecting vested interests.
Whenever I see WPATH, I can’t help but think of New-Path from A Scanner Darkly. You know, the organization that runs a network of clinics for dealing with addiction to Substance D, while secretly being the source of the little, blue flower the shit’s made from? I mean, it’s only NE off.
They did a really good job with the film, but I’ll recommend the novel, it’s among PKD’s best. And, good analogy, NiV.