One of the TRAs replying to Duncan actually said that gender identity is a social construct and not innate.
This is what I mean when I say that if you push them, they start twisting themselves into knots that undermine their own positions. If you’re arguing with one of these in a situation that affords you the opportunity, then keep score. Write down what they say each is in concise language, as well as the links between those things and actions taken. If you don’t keep score, they’ll just verbally wander aimlessly, sneakily changing their answers. You can only keep them on track by pointing to what you’ve written.
Good bit of grift Jolyon has established here. Salary of a Parliament member, no real responsibilities, and a budget to build his own brand as social crusader. All as a side-hustle for his law practice. Answerable to a board made up of two friends. Both men, natch.
I know this wouldn’t fly in court, but it would be fun if counsel for Alliance LGB dressed up as foxes. Imagine the meltdown! Psyops for the win!
Speaking of meltdowns, here’s Maya Forstater’s take on Stonewall’s mission abandonment, as well as its current desperation: https://thecritic.co.uk/stonewalls-ratner-moment/
One of the TRAs replying to Duncan actually said that gender identity is a social construct and not innate.
This is what I mean when I say that if you push them, they start twisting themselves into knots that undermine their own positions. If you’re arguing with one of these in a situation that affords you the opportunity, then keep score. Write down what they say each is in concise language, as well as the links between those things and actions taken. If you don’t keep score, they’ll just verbally wander aimlessly, sneakily changing their answers. You can only keep them on track by pointing to what you’ve written.
Good bit of grift Jolyon has established here. Salary of a Parliament member, no real responsibilities, and a budget to build his own brand as social crusader. All as a side-hustle for his law practice. Answerable to a board made up of two friends. Both men, natch.