The most vulnerable
Something I always wonder about this guy.
He’s not a random young woke “activist” on Twitter, he’s an adult QC, yet he echoes the childish woke rhetoric as if there were nothing childish about it. It sounds bizarre coming from establishment figures like QCs.
Specifically, what makes him think that men who say they are women are “the most vulnerable in society”? That claim entails thinking that men are vulnerable to women; how did he get there? What sense does that make? Why does he believe that, or pretend to believe it?
I don’t suppose I’ll ever find out. Life is frustrating that way.
Well, the TRAs do shout it very loudly. Isn’t that the measure of truth? He who shouts loudly and often shall be heard, and it shall be proof of his claims.
There are several other groups I would nominate for “most vulnerable” before trans. Like: non-white people. disabled. children. disabled children. the elderly. the poor. women. Every single one of those groups is more vulnerable than trans. Wait. Without data, I can’t actually say that (unless I scream it loudly or put it on Twitter six times). I would say that I suspect that every single one of those groups is more vulnerable than trans.
Well I suppose it all depends on to what he thinks trans people are most vulnerable. Being tickled? Being ignored? Weight gain/loss? COVID-19? Political messages? Being laughed at?
One would think that a Q.C. would be more precise with his words, what with all that legal training he’s had. Oops, sorry, I forgot for a second that ambiguity of their terms is the main weapon in the TRA arsenal.
The most vulnerable? I have yet to see a woman threaten to beat a transperson in social media – though admittedly my sample size is small..
Why does he believe that men-who-say-they’re-women are vulnerable to everyone-and-thus-women? Why does a Catholic believe in “the Father the almighty, maker of Heaven and Earth, of all that is seen and unseen”?
I think it starts with this or this, then advances to this, and ultimately becomes this.
Perhaps he just saw a bandwagon approaching, leapt on it without doing his due diligence, and now lacks the humility to disembark. As the fox/kimono incident shows, he’s one for acting in haste and then not repenting at leisure.
Yeah but because one tranny hooker got murdered on skid row, that means middle-aged rich white dudes who wanna be women are teh most oppressed.
This is the guy who beat a fox to death with some blunt object while wearing a kimono (?) and then laughed about it on social media, right? I don’t think I would be using him as my barometer for human decency and I have hunted and still eat meat. This guy sounds like he gets off sexually on abusing animals.
Yes that’s the guy.