Since when has non-binary been a transgender category? By definition, a non-binary person claims to be neither male nor female while a transgender person claims to be the opposite of their actual sex*.
Anyway, ‘trans siblings’ is no more inclusive than ‘brothers and sisters’. The definition of ‘sibling’ is ‘brother or sister’. Words, eh! How the fuck do they work?
* which is itself wrong, but I think we’re all used to them claiming sex and gender to be the same thing and also totally different things depending on which version best supports their case at any given time. It’s another parallel with religion, specifically the Holy Trinity, in which the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit are three distinct and seperate entities – but are one. The Father is not the Son, the Son is not the Holy Spirit, the Holy Spirit is not the Father, but then again, the Father is the Son, the Son is the Spirit, the Spirit is the Father. They are one, but they are three, and so-on.
Compare that to the idea that sex is not a binary, it is a spectrum of genders, which are…erm….male, female, neither, Transgender is not transexual, but there are no transmasculine or transfeminine categories as they would reinforce the binary that does not exist, but a belief that one’s gender does not match one’s sex results in a change of one’s stated sex, and a change of sex, whether by declamation or operation, is transgender.
A cynic might claim that both concepts are intended to be confusing and self-contradicting; it deters most people from thinking too much about them, and the last thing that peddlers of nonsensical ideas want is too much scrutiny of their wares.
No woman I have ever been with has enjoyed sex. They just seem so bored and quiet. Sometimes they giggle when I undress but otherwise, disinterested. Women don’t enjoy sex, fact.— Rahul Kohli (@RahulKohli13) May 13, 2019
latsot, it also seems to me that Rahul has jumped to broad conclusions based on an insufficient sample size. I find this consistent with the general narcissism of the trans cult: they believe that their experiences matter more than others’. Oh wait, maybe there’s a connection there.
Well, as far as women enjoying sex…I have discovered that there are men out there who are so focused on their own pleasure that they do nothing for the woman. I have not had a broad or deep sex life, only a handful, and my ratio of men where I enjoyed sex was 3 crap for every 1 worthwhile.
Yeah, self-owned. He is a crap lover, so women don’t enjoy sex with him.
Just a common garden variety misogynist then, as so many TRA’s are.
Since when has non-binary been a transgender category? By definition, a non-binary person claims to be neither male nor female while a transgender person claims to be the opposite of their actual sex*.
Anyway, ‘trans siblings’ is no more inclusive than ‘brothers and sisters’. The definition of ‘sibling’ is ‘brother or sister’. Words, eh! How the fuck do they work?
* which is itself wrong, but I think we’re all used to them claiming sex and gender to be the same thing and also totally different things depending on which version best supports their case at any given time. It’s another parallel with religion, specifically the Holy Trinity, in which the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit are three distinct and seperate entities – but are one. The Father is not the Son, the Son is not the Holy Spirit, the Holy Spirit is not the Father, but then again, the Father is the Son, the Son is the Spirit, the Spirit is the Father. They are one, but they are three, and so-on.
Compare that to the idea that sex is not a binary, it is a spectrum of genders, which are…erm….male, female, neither, Transgender is not transexual, but there are no transmasculine or transfeminine categories as they would reinforce the binary that does not exist, but a belief that one’s gender does not match one’s sex results in a change of one’s stated sex, and a change of sex, whether by declamation or operation, is transgender.
A cynic might claim that both concepts are intended to be confusing and self-contradicting; it deters most people from thinking too much about them, and the last thing that peddlers of nonsensical ideas want is too much scrutiny of their wares.
He also managed a spectacular self-own:
latsot, it also seems to me that Rahul has jumped to broad conclusions based on an insufficient sample size. I find this consistent with the general narcissism of the trans cult: they believe that their experiences matter more than others’. Oh wait, maybe there’s a connection there.
Papito,
It reminds me a little of a friend who once told me “everywhere I go smells of piss” leaving everyone to draw their own conclusions.
there you go again with your microaggressions against the aromatic.
latsot,
How long before we start to see “enjoys sex” as a diagnostic criterion that a “assigned female” is a trans man?
Screechy, will it be seen as proof of theory that transition can cure that condition?
Well, as far as women enjoying sex…I have discovered that there are men out there who are so focused on their own pleasure that they do nothing for the woman. I have not had a broad or deep sex life, only a handful, and my ratio of men where I enjoyed sex was 3 crap for every 1 worthwhile.
Yeah, self-owned. He is a crap lover, so women don’t enjoy sex with him.