I get lots of communications from Amnesty inserted into publications I read, about one a week on average. They contain reply-paid Freepost envelopes. Today I sent one off with a piece of paper with just the three words WOMEN NOT WOMXN written in large letters. I don’t feel particularly good about wasting their resources in this way, but unless there are costs to their misogynistic posturing they’re unlikely to stop.
If trans women and “non-binary siblings” (?) are included in “all women”, then they can just say “women”, right?
Even going by their own rules it seems obnoxious to separate out “trans sisters”. Are they saying they’re somehow not 100% women? I sure hope not.
As for “non-binary siblings”, well, I guess they can consider themselves included or not depending what currently is striking their fancy.
our trans sisters and non binary siblings and gender fluid transhuman mythological and biological species.
There. I iz soh inklussive!
I get lots of communications from Amnesty inserted into publications I read, about one a week on average. They contain reply-paid Freepost envelopes. Today I sent one off with a piece of paper with just the three words WOMEN NOT WOMXN written in large letters. I don’t feel particularly good about wasting their resources in this way, but unless there are costs to their misogynistic posturing they’re unlikely to stop.
If ANY TRAs showed the faintest trace of ‘standing with women,’ this wouldn’t be such an embarrassment.
I’m sure they are out there, but keeping mighty quiet while the trolls are in charge of the topic.