It was the patriotism
Hey about that whole pardons thing.
Funny how it’s always Republicans. Clinton’s pardon of Marc Rich was disgusting, but it didn’t open all the doors to criminality the way Ford’s and Bush’s did, let alone the way Trump’s are.
Upon discovering this secret aid, Congress outlawed it, in amendments attached to annual defense appropriations bills and therefore known after their sponsor as the Boland Amendments.
So haha, Reagan wasn’t having that.
North was convicted of obstruction instead; an appeals court threw out the conviction 2-1 because the jury might have been influenced by North’s televised testimony to Congress. Walsh prosecuted former national security adviser John Poindexter for similar offenses next, obtaining a conviction that was thrown out for identical reasons.
Heads they win tails we lose.
Walsh found himself further frustrated by official refusals to acknowledge the existence of contemporaneous notes and claims never even to have received his requests for such notes. He got former defense secretary Caspar Weinberg’s notes only in late 1991, and Bush’s diary in November 1992—after the president had lost his reelection bid. Such delays helped ensure Walsh couldn’t indict Weinberger for obstruction until June 1992. Walsh filed a further charge in October using evidence from Weinberger’s notes showing that Bush knew about the arms-for-hostages portion of the deal. Weinberger’s trial would therefore surely have implicated Bush.
Buuuuut Bush pardoned him.
Bush also pardoned Robert MacFarlane, Elliott Abrams, and three CIA officers for their roles in Iran-Contra. Walsh—a lifelong Republican—said, “In light of President Bush’s own misconduct, we are gravely concerned about his decision to pardon others who lied to Congress and obstructed official investigations.” “The Iran-Contra cover-up, which has continued for more than six years, has now been completed with the pardon of Caspar Weinberger,” Walsh noted.
But Bush prettied it up.
When pardoning the Iran-Contra criminals, President Bush said, “the common denominator of their motivation—whether their actions were right or wrong—was patriotism.”
Yeeeahhhh anybody can say that. The Nazis could and did say that. Trump says that constantly (in cruder words, of course). Patriotism excuses nothing.
And what Trump is doing now…you know how that sentence ends.
Imagine a Democrat illegally sending arms to an Islamic nation. Impeachment would be the least of it.
It’s a strange business, with dubious bedfellows:
.
https://www.globalpolicy.org/iraq-conflict-the-historical-background-/us-and-british-support-for-huss-regime.html#:~:text=In%20the%201980s%2C%20the%20US,Iraqi%20air%20and%20missile%20attacks.
On a totally unrelated note, one of HW’s pre-VP jobs was head of the CIA.
Omar #3
No, the US & the UK are far from having clean hands. Another thing that they, together with Australia, were involved in fomenting were the massacres in Indonesia in 1965-1966. In that reputedly (in the West) peaceful and artistic island of Bali, a larger percentage of Balinese were murdered, as old scores going back to the Japanese occupation and the attempted Dutch return were settled, than the percentage of the population killed in Cambodia by Pol Pot, his henchmen, and his child soldiers.
And in other news, George Blake died today at the age of 98. (He was a member of MI6 who worked for the KGB.)