It all gets thrown out
Recyling plastic? It’s a con job. Has been all along.
The US used to send most of its used plastic to China for recycling, but two years ago China said that’s enough now, and no one else wants it.
But when Leebrick tried to tell people the truth about burying all the other plastic, she says people didn’t want to hear it.
“I remember the first meeting where I actually told a city council that it was costing more to recycle than it was to dispose of the same material as garbage,” she says, “and it was like heresy had been spoken in the room: You’re lying. This is gold. We take the time to clean it, take the labels off, separate it and put it here. It’s gold. This is valuable.”
I never thought it was valuable, but I did think it could be re-used. Maybe a break-even thing, maybe an added expense thing, but still worth doing. But nah.
But it’s not valuable, and it never has been. And what’s more, the makers of plastic — the nation’s largest oil and gas companies — have known this all along, even as they spent millions of dollars telling the American public the opposite.
Now why the hell would they do that? Oh I know – so that we would keep buying plastic. So that we would not look at all those yogurt tubs and juice bottles and cringe at the waste and the toxic materials added to the brew.
Yep, that’s why.
The industry’s awareness that recycling wouldn’t keep plastic out of landfills and the environment dates to the program’s earliest days, we found. “There is serious doubt that [recycling plastic] can ever be made viable on an economic basis,” one industry insider wrote in a 1974 speech.
Yet the industry spent millions telling people to recycle, because, as one former top industry insider told NPR, selling recycling sold plastic, even if it wasn’t true.
“If the public thinks that recycling is working, then they are not going to be as concerned about the environment,” Larry Thomas, former president of the Society of the Plastics Industry, known today as the Plastics Industry Association and one of the industry’s most powerful trade groups in Washington, D.C., told NPR.
…
Here’s the basic problem: All used plastic can be turned into new things, but picking it up, sorting it out and melting it down is expensive. Plastic also degrades each time it is reused, meaning it can’t be reused more than once or twice.
In short it’s not worth doing in cash terms so forget it. Forget recycling that is, don’t forget making more and more plastic. Plastic forevaaaaaa!
Starting in the 1990s, the public saw an increasing number of commercials and messaging about recycling plastic.
Messaging that said it’s great, do lots of it.
It may have sounded like an environmentalist’s message, but the ads were paid for by the plastics industry, made up of companies like Exxon, Chevron, Dow, DuPont and their lobbying and trade organizations in Washington.
Industry companies spent tens of millions of dollars on these ads and ran them for years, promoting the benefits of a product that, for the most part, was buried, was burned or, in some cases, wound up in the ocean.
…
“This advertising was motivated first and foremost by legislation and other initiatives that were being introduced in state legislatures and sometimes in Congress,” Freeman says, “to ban or curb the use of plastics because of its performance in the waste stream.”
It’s almost funny, in a way. They got the blue plastic bins going, they got us all using the blue plastic bins, and it was all so that plastic could go right on being dumped in landfills and oceans but we wouldn’t mind any more.
Analysts now expect plastic production to triple by 2050.
Boom-tish.
I remember being very surprised by an episode on recycling on Penn & Teller’s Bullshit!, but I didn’t know how seriously to take it given P&T’s libertarian leanings.
I’ve been teaching this to my students for years; most environmental scientists were aware of the issues with recycling plastic, but no one listened. My students come out of class convinced I told them that they just need to recycle. I actually tell them recycling is not nearly as important as changing our habits. They don’t hear that, because they are in my class 3 hours a week; the other messages hit them 24/7 – including the large recycling bins the school invested over a quarter of a million dollars in a few years ago to show how sustainable they are. Our recycling has not increased at all, because so many people resent being told to recycle that they deliberately throw things away…and we don’t have a contract for recycling with our local waste disposal, so they just take it out with the trash anyway.
Recycling is a sham…it’s mostly for show. Aluminum recycling can work, and does, because the canning companies know it’s cheaper than new aluminum made from raw materials. Glass recycling can work, but it seems no one in the US is willing to use glass anymore. Our recycling doesn’t even take it, because there is no market.
Glass recycling can work, but it seems no one in the US is willing to use glass anymore.
Glass in Aus is being broken down and added to bitumen for roads.
https://infrastructuremagazine.com.au/2019/06/17/recycling-plastic-and-glass-into-road-materials/
https://www.thefifthestate.com.au/innovation/materials/paving-the-roads-with-glass/
Plastic is being used to replace timber and concrete in some areas.
https://truegridpaver.com.au/
https://www.replas.com.au/products/fencing/
I have witnessed trucks that collect recycles dump into the open fill at landfills in several counties in various states. I think *some* recycling happens, but most of it ends up being buried in the fill. So rinsing out your recycles and taking time to carefully separate them is mostly for your own amusement. Sad but true.
https://youtu.be/wliz5ALNqc4 Making recycled plastic as good as new Aug 2, 2020 10:34
for those of us old enough to remember, memorable messaging
https://youtu.be/PSxihhBzCjk
Our town transfer station has big recycle bins for: newsprint, mixed paper, corrugated cardboard, translucent plastic, other plastic, glass jars/bottles, aluminum cans, steel cans, scrap metal. I was gamely doing my best to abide by this scheme until a couple of months ago they changed the labeling on the other plastic bin. Now it only accepts a few very specific types of plastic, and as best I can tell we use so little of those few types that it isn’t worth sorting them out of our waste stream. So now we just dump all our plastic with the (non-recycle) garbage.
One of my good friends made specialty plastic items all his life. When he retired and sold his business he started up a plastic recycling company, mainly to keep busy. With one exception he takes only virgin waste only. So for instance he can recycle HDPE pipe (unused), or LDPE packaging film (unused) and turn these back into pellets for making new product. The only post-consumer product he takes is milk bottles. The baled bottles are shredded and go down through a cleaning and drying process before being turned into new pellets. He uses cleaned rainwater to top up the system and has his own closed loop system for treating and purifying the wash water. Control of water, energy and chemical inputs is critical. He can make about 10 cents a kilo from milk bottles. His recycled plastic is more pure than the virgin material.
He told me a while back that plastic has been an enormous con job that he now regards as deeply mistaken and unsustainable. Part of the problem with recycling is that most plastics contain modifiers. This makes it impractical to recycle mixed plastics into any high value product that is itself recyclable. The other problem with post consumer plastic is that often things like pouches or bottles are multiple layers of different plastics, sometimes bonded together. On top of that it takes very little food waste to hopelessly contaminate the plastics beyond any ability to recycle them without using more energy and creating more waste than to make new.
While China was taking our recycling, Christchurch had a flourishing recycling system. Now the price paid for raw recycling has crashed and if a truck is regarded as more than 10% rubbish or food waste contamination it’s off to the dump.
Local supermarkets have done away with single use plastic bags, but it’s actually very hard to buy food or consumer goods not wrapped in plastic. They are now using recycled plastic for meat trays, which is something, but it’s far from sustainable.
I’ve taken to composting as much paper waste as possible because there’s no market for that anymore either.
There exist products made from recycled plastic and recycled paper, so some recycling necessarily happens, and metal recycling is a big industry, but I think it’s a small percentage, aside from metals, that actually makes it back into the consumer stream. I’m sure it has to do with cost effectiveness.
@3 Here too, in fact they have been experimenting with concrete and asphalt concrete fillers for decades, trying to find a low cost way to stretch the materials while getting rid of what is usually considered waste. I don’t know if I’d want asphalt (bitumen) roads embedded with broken glass though, road rash is bad enough in a motorcycle crash, but broken glass would make it more of a cheese grater experience.
In the UK, domestic recycling is usually organised by local councils and some are better than others. Some councils have contracted their recycling activities abroad to the cheapest bidder and the waste has inevitably been found in landfills. Those councils have claimed ignorance, even though they have a duty to make sure the recycling takes place.
Our local council happens to be moderately good. It recycles most glass, paper and cardboard and some plastics. Of the waste it can’t recycle, a fairly large percentage goes to make fuel and concrete. Unfortunately, this could change at any moment and we probably wouldn’t find out about it without a FOI request.
I think it’s more than that; once you expend all those resources in sorting it–which must be done, because there are different kinds that don’t mix–it can only be used again maybe once. Are you really even coming out ahead, environmentally speaking?
No you’re not; the article spelled that out at some point.
As I said @7, control of water, energy and chemical inputs is critical. otherwise, distasteful as it is, making new product and throwing it away may have less negative impact on the environment than recycling.
you can of course change the economics by requiring a total life cycle cost for any new plastic produced that ensures recycling becomes economic. That doesn’t mean that the environmental effects become less though. it’s actually a complex problem that is best solved by an ethical choice driving economics. We can all see how well ethical choices are going at the moment. :-(