Climate change—>violence against women
When things get bad, women get punished.
Climate-related crises in poorer countries increases violence and exploitation of women, says a recent report, and current attempts to address climate change fail to tackle this issue. This was the conclusion reached by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN)…
“We found gender-based violence to be pervasive,” said Cate Owren, lead author of the report, to the publication, “and there is enough clear evidence to suggest that climate change is increasing gender-based violence.”
Naturally. When the situation worsens, the strong oppress the weak more than ever. Men are stronger than women.
The study found evidence that poorer countries struggle the most with handling events influenced by climate change — such as droughts, extreme natural disasters, and ecological changes that create food or water scarcity — and that the stress or struggle to manage these pressures can result in an increased rate of “gender-based violence.”
For the purposes of the study, “gender-based violence” included “domestic violence, sexual assault and rape, forced prostitution, forced marriage and child marriage, as well as other forms of exploitation of women.” These countries aren’t typically the largest contributors of carbon emissions in the world, but they face a disproportionate amount of harm from the climate crisis.
The rich countries do it to the poor countries, and the men in the poor countries do it to the women. Misery goes downward until the bottom is saturated.
Climate change can increase the frequency of disasters or make them more destructive, which hurts a community’s ability to bounce back. When this happens in a country where women already lack rights, the struggle to recover can lead to their exploitation. According to the study, nearly 12 million additional young girls are believed to be married off after natural disasters. And previous research by anti-slavery organizations have found that sex trafficking increases by 20-30 percent after a climate-related disaster.
It makes a kind of sense. Young girls get married off because that’s one less mouth to feed. Sex trafficking increases because it’s profitable and profit=more of the scarce resources.
Illegal activities, such as poaching and illegal resource extraction, also increase after climate-related devastation. These illegal activities, Owren found, are closely linked with the exploitation of women and young girls. In one example, the study detailed instances of fishermen in eastern and southern Africa who wouldn’t sell fish to women unless they paid with sex. Similar examples were found with illegal logging and charcoal industries in Congo as well as illegal mines in Colombia and Peru.
Never waste a woman, right?
“Gender-based violence?” It’s really sex based violence they're talking about, though, isn't it? This is an instance (among many) where bending the knee to the delicate sensibilites of the GI crowd really messes up the story being told. These women and girls can't "identify" out of the sex-based violence to which they are being subjected. Reporting like this could lead to demands by TRAs that any alleviation of the effects of these increasing threats be "centered on" TIMs, who are, as we are all told constantly, the most at risk and oppressed humans on the face of the Earth.
Earlier reporting on B&W regarding the cancellation of the publication of a work by co-authored by environmental writer Derrick Jensen because of some transgression against trans ideology gives you an idea of where their priorities are. First things first: it is more important to punish Gender Criminals and TERFs than to stop the Earth from burning.
Speaking of the burning Earth, I recently finished reading The Uninhabitable Earth by David Wallace Wells, which paints a vivid and harrowing picture of what will happen to human communities and institutions with just a few degrees of warming, including the increase in interpersonal violence. One of the things that surprised me is that much of our current crisis is not the result of the two centuries since the inception of the Industrial Revolution (or the millenia since the Agricultural one), but the result of the huge use of fossils fuels since the middle of the 20th century:
Sorry for this long-winded comment…
‘
Don’t apologize, it’s a fine comment.