A devious way to push a message
The CBC reports – not honestly – on the Rowling billboard matter.
A billboard on a busy part of Hastings Street in Vancouver supporting author J.K. Rowling’s controversial views about gender identity was hastily covered over the day after it was put up.
That’s why I say “not honestly.” The headline is more honest:
I Love J.K. Rowling sign makes brief, controversial appearance in Vancouver
That’s fair, but the first sentence is shamefully dishonest. The billboard does not “support J.K. Rowling’s controversial views about gender identity.” All the billboard does is express love for Rowling. That’s it. “I heart [love] JK Rowling”; the end. Most people who see the billboard aren’t going to know that trans activists consider Rowling an Evil TERF, or that Rowling has views on what “trans” means and what it implies for women’s rights. That means that most people are not going to see a hidden message about the tension between women’s rights and the current version of trans activism. That means it’s just dishonest to claim that the hidden meaning is actually not hidden at all but explicitly printed out on the billboard. The hidden meaning is hidden.
It was a test, you know. They failed it, you know.
The test was “will they even suppress a message expressing love for Rowling, a message that doesn’t say a word about her views?” And in mere hours the answer was yes we will. FAIL.
Amy Hamm, who lives in New Westminster and Chris Elston, a South Surrey resident, paid Pattison Outdoor, an arm of the Jim Pattison Group to put up the sign on Friday around 6:30 a.m. PT.
They copied a similar sign that was erected in Edinburgh over the summer to support the famous author’s claims that having individuals self-identify their gender could pose a threat to women and children who are not transgender.
The Edinburgh sign was Posie Parker’s work.
Posts Elston and Hamm put on social media about the billboard attracted criticism including Vancouver City Coun. Sarah Kirby-Yung who tweeted that it was “meant to to stoke hate, exclusion and division.”
Vancouver City Councillor Sarah Kirby-Yung should take a look at the hate and abuse that was vomited out about Rowling over the summer.
Morgane Oger, a transgender advocate and a former B.C. NDP provincial candidate, said the sign is a devious way to push a message of hate about gender identity although many people would not understand what it means.
Actually it’s the other way around – the buzzwords around trans activism are a devious way to push a message that men can literally be women if they think they are say they are feel as if they are imagine they are fantasize they are. The devious pushing is from the trans “community,” not from feminists.
“The purpose of this sign was to harass the community, targeting them because of who they are and trying to get them to react through a message only they recognize.”
Says the misogynist guy who has been bullying a Vancouver rape crisis shelter for years.
I wonder what most Canadians would think on seeing this billboard if they were aware that TRAs push a message of exclusion, and that one is excluding adult human females from the category “woman”?
Wouldn’t it be nice to see an article biased equally in the other direction?
.
Yes, exactly which side is being “devious” in the message that it’s pushing?
For those who have not read it (or for anyone who would like to read it again), here’s a link to Barra Kerr’ s “Pronouns are Rohypnol”:
https://fairplayforwomen.com/pronouns/