We teach ourselves techniques of dress
It was all a mistake about the proletariat and the means of production and all that. It turns out it’s trans people who are the true proletariat and cis people who live off their exploited labor.
Transition is work. Transition is the labour that continually gives birth to gender, that produces liveably gendered lives under intolerable conditions. And the workplace of gender, like any workplace, cannot be borne except through self-abnegation, exhaustion, lies, glimpses of satisfaction strung out along the working week, alienation, and endless work.
I’m not clear on where we go to buy the gender that they produce with the labour of transition, but I’m deeply sympathetic about the endless work. (Most of that work is shouting at women on Twitter, I guess?)
We teach ourselves techniques of dress from online tutorials and whispered conversations. We write dissertation-length posts on support forums detailing self-medication hormone regimes. We order multiple binders and gaffs from exploitative internet retailers and submit the return labels before anyone notices. We labour for hours before the mirror to bring to the inclusive workplace a gender which can be named, respected, spoken with pronouns, paraded in front of diversity working groups.
Hm. I thought there already was a gender or two in the workplace. Is the idea that trans genders were needed for the sake of keeping diversity working groups occupied? But isn’t that a tiny bit…circular?
We teach doctors our medical pathways and pretend to be attentive when they repeat our knowledge back to us. We tweet messages in support of the liberal recognition schemes cooked up by our middle-managers to ensure our compliant participation in the workplace, the household, the nuclear family. We perform reason and tolerance, we absorb the hate and shame of our antagonists, we are the dump for all the sexual anxiety and gender horror of a society sickened by its own creations. We are sex workers. (Decrim now!) We make your entertainment, your food, your computers, your care packages, your websites, your education system, your knowledge, your play, your city.
Really? As such? That is, trans people alone make our entertainment, our food, our computers, our care packages, our websites, our education system, our knowledge, our play, our city?
Interesting if true, because I thought it was trans people as part of the larger body known as people, as opposed to trans people only. If the point is that it’s trans people as part of the larger body known as people, then…ok? And? What new thing have we learned here?
Marked by capitalism as those with too much gender and too little, we work a second shift, a third shift, a fourth, to acquire the resources necessary to produce our genders, to produce genders survivable under capitalism, at least for another year. And further, as those whom capitalism has produced through its cisheteropatriarchal division of sex classes and gendered labour, whom capitalism has spat out as the uncosted externality of gender, we labour to produce the very gender on which capitalism depends. You live in our work.
So…there’s an invisible army of trans people laboring (underground is it?) to produce gender, which the rest of us simply put on and wear unthinkingly, heedless of the millions of tormented peasants toiling away at their…lathes? Drills? Coal faces?…to produce that which we wear in all our arrogance and cissitude.
Our care work is unpaid. Our medical expertise is unpaid. Our gender production is unpaid. Our advocacy is unpaid. Our training is unpaid. Our support work is unpaid. Our teaching is unpaid. Our writing is unpaid.
Well…lots of things are unpaid. Lots of activities are unpaid, because lots of activities are not transactional in the first place, and because some potentially payable activities aren’t performed well enough to be paid. I would put the “medical expertise” of random trans activists in the latter category.
Everywhere there are trans people, there are people communally producing transitions. In trans communities, we teach each other the skills of dress, voice, deportment, body modification and self-imagining which are essential to liveable trans lives.
Ohhhh, that’s what the labour is. Not toiling underground at a workbench but telling each other how to Talk Like a Gurl. What’s the going rate for that? $500 an hour?
There’s miles and miles more of it. There’s a list of Acknowledgements at the end, one paragraph of which especially caught my attention:
I learned the term “sur-thrivance” from a group exhibition by Indigenous artists, Two-Spirit Sur-Thrivance and the Art of Interrupting Narratives, at the gallery Never Apart in unceded Kahnawake Mohawk Territory on the island of Tiohtiake.
Mmhmm. Always appropriate something from someone indigenous; that’ll fetch’em or I don’t know Arkansas.
Wait a minute, I thought their genders were innate? Part of their brain? Why do they need resources to produce what is innate?
And as for what they do for the rest of us – produce gender? Yeah. That’s what we’re pissed about. We have been trying to deal with the shit of gender production our entire lives, because we are women who have lived that shit for our entire lives, and here come these men-that-feel-like-women to thrust the gender back at us. Oh, what you wear, is it? How you walk, is it? Make up? Jewelry?
This is the best statement I have seen in a long time to show that trans-activists have absolutely zero idea what it feels like to be a woman, what it means to be a woman, what a woman is, or how to be a woman. They get their information from television shows and fashion ads.
This is not work that they should be paid for; this is work they should not be doing. No one should be doing. They are reinstituting what us “white” “old” feminists spent decades trying to clear away. Can anyone say patriarchy?
And for woke people who love to scream “first world problems” at anyone who has a problem that they think is unimportant, this list should be an eye-opener. These “problems” pale in comparison even to what most first-world problems are – feeding your family, dealing with horrifying diseases, car wrecks, chronic illnesses, crappy bosses, Donald Trump…so, hey, get over it, okay?
Gender defined in these terms is something I neither want nor need, and therefore see little reason to congratulate these sad warriors, pay them for it, or accept what they are offering even if they offer it for free.
Indeed.
Apparently you’re making a product we don’t want and is inherently harmful. And who wants to buy it? Practically no one.
Perhaps that’s why this “work” is so thankless.
So “being yourself” is a lot more work than I thought. Sounds like toxic cosplay.* And word salad.
Not so well, from what I’ve seen.
*That would make a cool name for a band! Too bad I’m not in one anymore…
This reads like a parody (or bad imitation) of a feminist diatribe on all the unpaid work women do, and are expected to do. So it’s not just appropriating from the indigenous.
Kind of echoing YNNBruce, “being myself” means taking a shower, brushing my teeth, and clean underwear (as long as the rest isn’t dirty and smelly). Unless the job requires a certain level of dress what You decide to wear is all on You.
Ms. Benson @ 0 and Sastra @ 4 – I believe this writer is also appopriating from the experiences of Deaf people and people with disabilities. The amount of unpaid labor they have to invest into gaining access to all spaces, public and private – from education to employment to freaking restaurants, etc. – is extraordinary, including in the U.S., which has the Americans with Disabilities Act (gutted by the Supreme Court, rewritten by Congress to be stronger, again gutted). The author of this screed is making a highly inappropriate parallel.
It’s not sly enough to be a parody, so I’m guessing it’s an inappropriate imitation.
I just read (or skimmed-read) the entire essay, which the writer claims was funded by Dundee Contemporary Arts for an exhibition. Maybe. It had occurred to me more than once that some sly satirist (or bored group of them) was throwing a lot of far left-wing postmodern Marxist transgender transfeminist overwrought boilerplate into a blender and vomiting it out to see if anyone fell for it, but the list of “the many voices which which I seek to harmonise” at the end gives sources a little too disingenuously.
At first I thought the basic point was to completely fund everything connected to transition, including the lives of the transgendered, but as I read on I came to the conclusion that not only did I not understand it, but I wasn’t supposed to understand it. So that’s nice, then.
Eff them. I buy my gender from China because they make it cheaper. I don’t care one bit about domestic gender labor. If they can’t compete with the gender factories in Shanghai they don’t deserve to be supported on sympathy.
“Transition is the labour that continually gives birth to gender, that produces liveably gendered lives under intolerable conditions.
…
We teach ourselves techniques of dress from online tutorials and whispered conversations.
…
We labour for hours before the mirror to bring to the inclusive workplace a gender which can be named, respected, spoken with pronouns, paraded in front of diversity working groups.”
Odd, I thought a trans person was trans due to having m mannerisms, likes, dislikes, personalities etc that are at odds with what people expect of their sex, but this list shows a surprising amount of training for something claimed to be their inner, most natural self.
And that last portion – OMFG. Do they think they are the only ones to labour in front of a mirror in order to meet expectations of appearance in the workplace? Have they simply not heard of those creatures… oh, what were they called again? You know, with the lipstick and those painful high heeled shoes and the chest bumps… oh yeah, WOMEN! Jesus Christ, the self-oriented ignorance of this author really shines through. To read this dreck, one would think feminism never existed. As usual, history only began when this ninny began taking notice.
So much for appreciating gendered labour!
“We teach doctors our medical pathways and pretend to be attentive when they repeat our knowledge back to us.”
My fucking God the hubris of this whine. And for extra facepalm points, I wonder if this author is one of those TRAs that disbelieve in sexual dimorphism.
I too thought it was indistinguishable from a parody, but at the same time I didn’t really think it was a parody. It’s definitely absurd enough to be a parody but the thing it would be parodying is every bit as absurd and more, so…one just can’t tell.
clamboy @ 6 – yes, I think you’re right.
I don’t know if anyone could that much effort into a parody of this sort. I think you need the Zeal of a True Believer to push out that much nonsense.
I love the whole “you’re welcome” tone of it and the art depicting chains being broken, fingernails being painted, injections being given, lipstick being applied, etc. Except that’s just what I thought it was — when I clicked through to the artist’s site, it seems the the art is supposed to be breaking the chains of having to do all those things. Well, maybe. It’s hard to tell. That seems to be the theme of the world lately.
Ah you must be unfamiliar with the Sokal hoax.
The author is in a band, Fit to Work. For those who like angry political hardcore punk from a leftist/anarchist perspective, like me, they are a good find. The music, very well played, walks right up to the line of incoherence while remaining tight as heck. They do an anti-police song titled “All Cats Are Beautiful,” and while my cats remain mum on their views on law enforcement, they heartily endorse the title, but with their usual, “Duh.” The band also released a song titled “I MIss Maths”.
To me, some of the lyrics veer into the wanky writing style of the essay linked to, but mostly not (thank goodness).