Some men came over to try to get us to leave
Yesterday a group of lesbians went to Bradford Pride to celebrate their sexuality and challenge the erasure of lesbians by transactivists.
They had a banner saying “lesbians don’t have penises” so you can guess what happened next.
We had decided to meet in a coffee shop before going into the square. Whilst sat drinking coffee we were approached by two police officers from West Yorkshire Police. They explained that someone had come to them and said that they’d seen some placards and so they wanted to make sure that there was nothing derogatory and that we were not a hate group. We assured them that we were just lesbians going to Pride. That WYP felt it necessary to question a group of lesbians sat in a public place should concern everyone. The state has no business intimidating or policing the peaceful behaviour of its citizens just in case they offend someone.
The placard in question read ‘Lesbian = Female HomoSEXual’. That this was worthy of attention from the police illustrates our point. Our belief is that lesbians have the right to chose their partners based on sex and not gender identity. This position does not conflict with the right of individuals to express themselves or to live their lives in the gender they choose- we are not anti-transgender or transphobic.
Doesn’t matter. It says the words or it gets the hose.
After Pride’s opening speeches, some men came over to try to get us to leave, when we refused they attempted to cover our banners with transgender flags. A gay man came over to explain that lesbians have no right to oppress transgender women by refusing to have relationships with them. A video of that exchange was recorded and even watching it back I can see a man looming over a woman on a mobility scooter trying to intimidate her. Gay men telling lesbians that they are bigoted to want same-sex relationships. A group of large men telling women to be quiet and capitulate to what men believe is right. Who is oppressing who here?
…
LGBT organisations do not advocate for or represent the L. This is typified by their stance on gender identity (see Stonewall’s revamped definition of the word ‘homosexual’) but it by no means ends there. Where is the funding for lesbian-only spaces and groups? Lesbians face additional challenges when coming out or being openly homosexual because they are women; this is rarely acknowledged and women are not supported. We are concerned that young women who are lesbian and gender non-conforming are instead being encouraged to become straight transmen. This is modern conversion therapy.
Aka woke conversion therapy.
Are straight men who don’t want to have sex with trans women bigots?
Are gay men who don’t want to have sex with trans men bigots?
Trans women who don’t want sex with gay men?
Etc.
On the subject of bans, some dreary news:
https://medium.com/@aytchellis/an-open-letter-to-twitters-board-of-directors-2d0b89195aff
I would say the issue is deeper than that. People have the right to choose their sexual partners based on sex if they wish, and depending on their choice and their own sex, they receive a label. A member of the female sex attracted to the female sex is called a lesbian. What is being dispute by the usual suspects is not that a person can choose their sexual partner, but for those people to identify and describe their own group.
I have not heard any such fuss raised over the gay community; yet again, this issue of being unable to define themselves rests solely on women.
“What is being dispute by the usual suspects is not that a person can choose their sexual partner…”
Well, no, that aspect is in fact being disputed by the usual suspects. Lesbians who reject transwomen as sexual partners are being called bigoted and transphobic. See “cotton ceiling”.
Refusing to have sex with = oppression? Well. TRA, meet Incel. I’m sure you have a lot to talk about.