Peak veronica
Veronica Ivy (formerly known as Rachel McKinnon) has another piece on How Evil Are The Feminists. It’s almost as if this trans thing is an excellent grift for Veronica Rachel.
Still full of lies though. Lies are not a great look on a philosopher.
Hate speech has no place in a free and democratic society. Freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom from the consequences of that speech. And yet, constantly, people in a position of relative power or authority seem to be saying that they should have the right to say or write rude, vile, violent or discriminatory things about their fellow citizens. But even more, they think that they should be legally protected from any and all consequences of those actions, even if their speech has negative consequences on the people to whom it is addressed.
By “rude, vile, violent or discriminatory things” he of course means things like “he.”
In early September 2018, Forstater had been a consultant to the Center for Global Development, which focuses on economic inequality, when she began using her personal Twitter account to tweet about her opposition to potential changes to the U.K.’s Gender Recognition Act, writing, “I share the concerns of @fairplaywomen that radically expanding the legal definition of ‘women’ so that it can include both males and females makes it a meaningless concept, and will undermine women’s rights & protections for vulnerable women & girls.”
He actually thinks (or is pretending to think, which would be much less surprising) he’s presenting an example of “rude, vile, violent or discriminatory things.”
Later that month, in a long series of tweets, she repeatedly misgendered Credit Suisse senior director Pips Bunce, who identifies as gender fluid, referring to her as “a man who likes to express himself part of the week by wearing a dress,” “a part-time cross dresser” and “a white man who likes to dress in women’s clothes.” As part of that discussion, she also tweeted, “I think that male people are not women.”
How is that misgendering? What’s the pronoun for gender-fluid? Is there one? How many pronouns do we have to memorize, and how many rules for knowing who is what?
He goes on to say that Bunce has said he “defaults to” she, but if he expects us to think that’s a binding law that applies to all of us, he expects in vain.
This, then, is what Forstater wanted the courts to uphold: Her right to make her co-workers uncomfortable; her right to place her nonprofit organization in an untenable position vis-à-vis potential donors (like Credit Suisse senior directors); her right to be, even as she defines it, rude and disrespectful in social and professional contexts; and her right to disrespect U.K. law, which defines transgender women as women and transgender men as men if they jump through the right legal hoops. (As Judge James Tayler noted in his ruling against her: “If a person has transitioned from male to female and has a Gender Recognition Certificate that person is legally a woman. That is not something that the Claimant is entitled to ignore.”)
The judge said we’re not entitled to ignore other people’s “Gender Recognition Certificates”? We’re not? So because people have a certificate, we’re required to believe or pretend to believe they are the sex we don’t perceive when we perceive them?
Well, I guess I’ll have to become an anarchist now.
Courts, of course, tend to look askance at being asked to rule that an employee should be allowed to harm their employers and co-workers based on “philosophical beliefs” they’ve decided are both “biological truths” and tantamount to religious canon.
What? They do? It comes up that often? I’m betting it doesn’t come up at all, this case excepted. McKinnon does make such sloppy claims for a philosopher. If he’d stopped at “co-workers” he’d have had a point, but the rest of it is just absurd.
Then he rants about Rowling for a few paragraphs, and sums up:
So, J.K. Rowling: Write whatever you please. Call yourself “gender critical,” if you like. Support any transphobic adult who’ll discriminate with you. Live your best life with your piles of Muggle money. But force cis, trans or intersex women to live with hostile work environments because of the fairytales that transphobes tell themselves? No. #TransRightsAreHumanRights #WhatDrillAreYouTalkingAbout
Ah yes the fairytales that people who don’t believe men can become women tell ourselves – we’re the ones living on fantasies.
“Hate speech has no place in a free and democratic society.”
I disagree, and fortunately, so do the courts in the U.S.
Not because I wish to engage in anything *I* would consider “hate speech,” but I sure as hell reserve my right to engage in speech that Veronica Ivy or some other authoritarian asshole wants to claim is “hate speech” as a way to shut people up.
Truly a public service that McKinnon-Ivy is providing here, giving a classic illustration of why hate speech laws suck.
Poster child type of thing.
One. ‘Sheheorit’, or as a drunk might pronounce after too much Christmas cheer ‘sheer heeorse shit.’
It was majorly insulting to refer to Rachel McKinnon as Rhys McKinnon. Is it similarly offensive to refer to Veronica Ivy as Rachel McKinnon?
I try to behave myself, but it is getting so confusing.
This all makes following the academic record rather, well academic.
If we now refer to Ivy as Rachel we will be shut down for “dead naming”, I suppose. What an Absolutley Fabulous way to leave the smouldering bridges behind for others, probably women, to repair.