On a busy day at the White House
Trump can multitask, at least he can when he has to pay off his consigliere.
On a busy day at the White House, President Trump hosted senators to talk about tax cuts, accused a Democratic congresswoman of distorting his condolence call to a soldier’s widow and suffered another court defeat for his travel ban targeting Muslim countries.
And at some point on Wednesday, Oct. 18, 2017, Mr. Trump took the time to sign a $35,000 check to his lawyer, who had made hush payments to prevent alleged sexual misconduct from being exposed before the 2016 presidential election.
As one does, you know.
At the heart of last week’s congressional testimony by Michael D. Cohen, Mr. Trump’s former lawyer, was the sensational accusation that the sitting president of the United States financed an illegal cover-up from inside the White House. The dates on the newly available checks shed light on the parallel lives Mr. Trump was living by this account — at once managing affairs of state while quietly paying the price of keeping his personal secrets out of the public eye.
The president hosted a foreign leader in the Oval Office, then wrote a check. He haggled over legislation, then wrote a check. He traveled abroad, then wrote a check. On the same day he reportedly pressured the F.B.I. director to drop an investigation into a former aide, the president’s trust issued a check to Mr. Cohen in furtherance of what federal prosecutors have called a criminal scheme to violate campaign finance laws at the direction of Mr. Trump.
Some days were more corrupt than others.
Jim Jordan says meh it’s no big deal plus we knew that already. Others disagree.
“The $35,000 is an indication of the quality of that evidence, and it both shows the extent of Trump’s leading role and now leaves little doubt that he faces criminal prosecution after he leaves office for the same offenses for which Cohen will serve time,” said Robert F. Bauer, a law professor at New York University and former White House counsel for President Barack Obama.
Indeed, some people close to Mr. Trump have privately predicted that he will ultimately choose to seek a second term in part because of his legal exposure if he is not president. While there is no legal consensus on the matter, Justice Department policy says that a president cannot be indicted while in office.
Ok that would be a first – a president seeking a second term as a cunning plan to avoid prison.
The Times tells us what else Trump was doing on the day he signed each check the Times has (a couple are missing). This one has a certain drollness to it, until one gets to the Putin part:
After the Oct. 18 check came one on Nov. 21, just two days before Thanksgiving when Mr. Trump pardoned a turkey, saying, “I feel so good about myself,” and then defended Roy S. Moore, the Republican Senate candidate in Alabama who had been accused of sexual misconduct with teenage girls. Mr. Trump also spoke by telephone that day with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia.
Let’s make him feel bad about himself.
Given Trump’s penchant for DARVO, is that even possible?
I can’t remember the last time I wrote a cheque. It is certainly more than 20 years ago since I haven’t owned a cheque book since I moved here. It seems weird to even think about people writing them these days.
So what’s his game, get a second term, die in office, stay out of jail? He can get on with the dying in office part any time he likes as far as I’m concerned.
Catwhisperer, considering his bigliest buddies on the international circuit, I’d say his game was finding a way to become leader for life and have the role passed on by inheritence in a monarchic/dictatorship mash-up style of governing. It has already been suggested that should he lose in 2020, he may just refuse to vacate the office without a fight.
What I will predict is that as the next election comes closer, his dirty tricks in 2016 will be as nothing to how he’ll be flinging shit this time around. I shouldn’t even be surprised if he were to attempt what the Republican wingnuts were insisting Obama would do ‘any day now’, namely invent some context to trigger a genuine national emergency and use his powers under that declaration to cancel the election.