If you cannot define women, then you cannot defend them
Councillor Sarah Field at Leeds Civic Hall yesterday:
Our brilliant panel of academics will be speaking today about the Declaration of Sex Based Rights. But by way of introduction I am going to talk a little bit about Leeds and why I’m here.
So, I just want to start off by thanking the many women on the Mumsnet Feminism boards. You are a constant strength and inspiration.
About three years ago, not long after I was first elected, I was contacted by a woman in Leeds, for advice. Her six year old daughter had been verbally attacked and then subjected to a violent outburst by a 17 year old male who had been allowed to join a local girls group as a helper. This was because he said he identified as a female. What had this child done? She had asked him if he was a boy. And then this six year old girl had been made to stand alone in front of the entire group and apologise to him.
And I couldn’t get my head around this. So I began to do some research. And this was how I found my way to gender critical thinking and radical feminism.
And these are the following statements I’d like to make:
Every single person on the planet is unique. And I don’t care what they wear. And I don’t care who they love or have sex with, as long as they are consenting adults.
There is no such thing as living as a woman. We are women. And it is our female biology which makes us women. It is our sex. And biological sex is observable in every single cell in our bodies: it is a physical, material and biological fact. And our sex is what makes us a class. Our sex which makes us uniquely vulnerable to male violence. Our sex which means we bear the entire burden of reproductive labour. The structural oppression which women face as a class is because of their sex. And that is why all women need legal recourse to separate and sex segregated spaces.
It is simply not ethical to categorise males as females based on their subjective feelings. To do so means the female sex no longer has legal protections or legal meaning and is instead reduced to destructive, regressive gender stereotyping.
If you cannot define women, then you cannot defend them.
Which brings me to Leeds City Council, which famously prevented a meeting here last year to discuss changes to the Gender Recognition Act. When the WPUK meeting was cancelled I read the email from a Labour Councillor and then I read the flurry of replies and actions that not once asked for clarification or any other viewpoints – just this blind acceptance of a hateful narrative – and it became clear to me that it’s become a virtue to dismiss, intimidate and silence women.
That meeting was to discuss proposed changes to legislation and the government’s consultation. Its purpose was not to tell Trans people what is best for them, but to tell politicians and law makers what is best for women.The vast majority of those who ask questions about Self-ID are lifelong left leaning, are lesbians, trade unionists, LGB allies and of all faiths and none. These accusations we face – transphobes, bigots, TERFs, religious fundamentalists, hate preachers – are utter nonsense. And I’ve had enough.And I must say I absolutely refute in the strongest terms any accusations of homophobia against gender critical women. A huge number of them are lesbians. And I stand with my lesbian sisters. Just as I’ve always done for years of solidarity with the LGB community. And since the woke brigade of word salad identity politics seems to love a good cliché, I’ll throw in a mention of my magnificent gay best friend and godfather to both my children.
Leeds City Council has brought in Self-Identification. Anyone can change their sex, or “gender marker” as they call it, across all council services and departments by completing a short online form.
When I asked, under FOI, for the Equality Impact Assessments I was told they didn’t do any. When I asked, under FOI, how this might impact sex segregated services and spaces I was told Leeds City Council does not have any such spaces or services. When I asked, under FOI, for a comprehensive list of women’s and men’s clothes, as cross dressing is specifically defined in council policy as a protected characteristic, I was told no such list exists. When asked to define a woman, they said no such definition exists.
So to be clear: men in this city can access a woman’s changing facility, toilet, leisure facility or support group or service – anywhere they are vulnerable, traumatised, undressed or asleep – because men might at some point feel like they are something which the council says is indefinable, but might mean he once wore something which may or may not be something a woman might also wear.
Well, women fought for those spaces and they are not this council’s to give away.
It is absurd, it is dangerous and millions of women across the country are saying we have had enough. You cannot identify into an oppressed class because you cannot identify out of an oppressed class. And women are uniquely oppressed across the planet: reproductive health and autonomy, Female Genital Mutilation, violence, rape, child marriage, no right to vote, death in childbirth, post-natal illness, denied access to education, lower wages, chemical contraception, sex trafficking, surrogacy, pornography, prostitution and objectification.
I’ve had women in prisons and post-prison services in Leeds who have contacted me in fear and despair because they are confined with men who threaten them with rape, assault them, repeatedly expose their so called female penises and taunt them about playing the system and flushing their hormones down the toilet.
Our statistics will be skewed and we will lose a tool of analysis that provides us with the ability to challenge the very inequalities for which sex based provisions and quotas were created.
And of course there is a wider underbelly of misogyny in Leeds. The so called managed zone of prostituted, emaciated and addicted women is our flagship. In the last few months I’ve visited Holbeck twice, once at night where I observed several men out on the street openly watching pornography in their cars as women stumbled to them to be used and discarded for a fiver. During the day I was approached by punters three times in 10 minutes while simply standing by a car for some fresh air at 2pm. We are spending hundreds of thousands of pounds so men can buy the addicted bodies of the most vulnerable women in the city. Men know what a woman is in Holbeck.
I’m often asked how I would feel if I was born in the wrong body. And I say, I’ve been feeling like that every single day for as long as I can remember. You only have to go into a shop, turn on the TV, open a magazine, click on the internet and women are assaulted with GET A BIKINI BODY, 12 WEEKS UNTIL YOUR CHRISTMAS PARTY BODY, GET THE BODY YOU DREAM OF, THE BODY OF SOMEONE 20 YEARS YOUNGER, THE BODY YOU DESERVE. Botox, surgery, hair removal, Photoshop, permanent makeup, designer vagina. We get it.
I don’t think all men are rapists. I don’t think all men are intrinsically violent, creepy or degenerate. God knows I love my dad and my brother and my dear nine year old son. But 98% of sexual violence is committed by men. And there is no way to tell the good ones from the bad ones. There never will be. That’s why we need our spaces and services and boundaries, for our privacy, our dignity and our safety. It’s why we need to preserve the social norms which generally prevent men from entering our spaces and preserve our confidence to challenge men who do so. Bad men will do anything to gain access to women and girls. That’s why every institution in the world attracts those who will use power and access to abuse us. If they do it in schools, the care system, churches and families then they will sure as hell do it in prisons, toilets, refuges and changing rooms. They already are.
In terms of protecting females from a significant minority of dangerous males, these reasons don’t cease to operate when males self-identify as women. And self-identification removes any gatekeeping, safeguarding or requirement for any man to do anything other than complete a cursory administrative process via an online form.
I’m truly sorry for any man who feels imprisoned and tortured by masculinity. But that is something for men to deconstruct, to dismantle and to overthrow. And there are men doing it. There are transsexuals and cross dressers and allies against the male stereotypes which damage everyone. But it is not the moral duty of women to facilitate that. If your feminism prioritises the internal identifications of men over the material conditions of women then you are not a feminist. In a world of structural and systematic oppression, and an epidemic of male violence, we owe it to women and to the legacy of every feminist who has fought before us, to stand for ourselves.
Thank you.
Editing to add:
Perfect. I love it.
*Applause*
Kept looking for the “like” button. So yeah. More of this sort of thing.
That is powerfully well spoken.
And also well-spoken power.
@Ophelia Benson
Haven’t commented for a while but would just like to say I was at the meeting and it was great (nothing like female solidarity) This issue was something I was mostly unaware of until the horrible treatment towards you by certain people at Freethought and Orbit . Even though it makes me angry and frustrated I’m glad I know what we’re up against. THANKS.
Thanks back, Tiko!
Brilliant.
It is becoming increasingly clear that there are far too many politicians, activists, councils, boards, institutions and organizations that aren’t the slightest bit interested in defending women, so the inability to define Woman.” isn’t rally a problem for them, at least for the moment. I think the thing now is to make them care.I daresay there are many, many more women (and men) who are (or would be) infuriated by this erosion of women’s sex-based rights than there are TRAs and woke camp followers working towards that erosion. They must be shown that there will be a cost to siding with the latter against the former, that they will be held to account and will pay that cost. If enough people who haven’t thought very much about this issue, who have not yet been peak transed and are just going along with the TRA ideological bandwagon because it seems to be “the right thing to do” (which pretty much described my own position on this before the FTB shitshow that was sprung on Ophelia) can be peeled away from supporting these anti-women measures, they might yet be defeated, prevented or rolled back. Or at least I hope so.
Wow, this speech is a barnstormer, packed full of good stuff. Though oddly enough, this:
reminds me of a Fresh Prince of Bel Air clip.
Yessssss! I have asked multiple TRAs how it would work out for them if a woman tried to identify her way out of the burka in Iraq/Pakistan etc.
Too many quotables to continue trying.
And of course there are those people who don’t think about it at all. They have little experience with trans, maybe a trans person in their community, and may just shrug and say it doesn’t affect them.
My experience is that most people are on neither side in this issue, because they don’t see it as an issue. It’s just what it was in the 1970s – a group of cross dressing men that you see, and sometimes some of them claim to be women. They assume all sexual changes involve going overseas for some sort of surgery. They have no knowledge that this is even happening. I think that is where the bulk of the country is, unless they happen to be in an area where there is a battle going on over bathroom use.
The problem is, a lot of the people who don’t like trans ideology also don’t like women, and that’s a risky coalition to make. Not because we are allying with right-wingers, as so many trans are fond of pointing out, but because of what we ultimately will have to give up in women’s rights to them. I think in this case, it’s the frying pan and the fire, and neither looks too positive for women.
The women’s movement has always been compromised to the greater good of other movements. The other movements that have been prioritized over women have been other groups of oppressed and marginalized people. Now men who identify as women are trying to push us back again, trying to convince people they are more marginalized, more put down, more oppressed. With many of the other groups, you could at least make a case for that (though I don’t think the case was as good as most think – I suspect many of the working women in the sweatshops probably were in very little better situation than many slaves, and even in the middle-class, a gilded cage is still a cage, marital rape is still rape, and having a soft bed to sleep in is not much compensation for being property of a man). This group, however, has very little to bank it on unless they “borrow” the statistics of LGB people.
Yes, I thought of that when I wrote my skreed above. I felt like a real wet blanket writing what I did, but as I was reading it through the original post again and thinking about the title of the post, I wondered “What if nobody is even interested in defending women? What if this impassioned declaration is met with silent indifference and the meeting simple moves on to the next item on the adgenda?”
(The original post is great and inspirational, immenintly quotable and a real barn-burner. Is there any video of this anywhere?)
YNNB – video is here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOxdD9LB4v0
Thanks tigger! I added it.
Thanks!