I see you have short hair, you need a support group
The Times (the London one):
As a self-proclaimed “leftie liberal”, Tracy Shaw, 44, a mother of three, had not taken much notice of the rise of transgender activism — but that all changed in the space of a few weeks last summer.
Her nine-year-old daughter brought home a notice from her gymnastics club in south Oxfordshire informing her that she would have to share changing rooms with trans children. Then a friend, who had to attend a rape crisis centre, was told that she had to be prepared to share details of her assault with self-indentifying women.
The final straw came when another friend’s teenage daughter, who has short hair and wears trousers, was approached by a teacher who asked if she wanted to join a support group for gender-questioning children.
So she set up a parents’ group with another woman, and they learned that the county’s schools were following guidelines created by trans activists.
Oxfordshire county council had issued a 50-page Trans Toolkit for Schools, subtitled “Gender is not just pink and blue”. The booklet had the support of 12 county, borough and metropolitan councils and was created with the involvement of a trans support group, Gendered Intelligence, and Allsorts Youth Project.
Andrews was particularly concerned by a section on breast binding, a controversial technique used by transgender men to create a flatter chest. The document urges teachers to be sensitive to the hygiene needs of pupils wearing binders on school trips. “It may be that pupils wash their binders every night at home and this will need to be considered on a residential trip,” it states.
Schools should not be treating binders as normal or encouraging their use.
The group got the council to agree to review the use of the guide.
Other groups of parents have been lobbying their local councils, which have also begun to make changes. Warwickshire county council has formally suspended use of the toolkit, and Sefton council, on Merseyside, which uses similar guidance, is reviewing its rules.
Parents spoke to The Sunday Times to share their stories, all insisting on anonymity. A mother in London said a teacher had concluded that her seven-year-old daughter was gender dysphoric as she was getting teased for having short hair and wearing boys’ clothes.
The teacher suggested the class read a book called 10,000 Dresses, in which the central character is a boy whose dreams of magical dresses help establish his true identity as a transgender girl.
A boy who likes dresses does not have a “true identity” as a transgender girl. This stuff is all such baby talk – it’s bizarre that so many people decided to believe it in such a mad rush.
Damn straight gender isn’t just about pink and blue. Which is exactly the fuck why a girl with short hair and jeans is just a girl with short hair and jeans, not secretly sussing out her trans identity. FFS this performative gender shit just makes me so angry.
At this particular time in my life, I have long hair and wear trousers; I must be really confused. And my trousers have pockets. With keys in them. I have hiking boots that I sometimes put pink laces in if I’m feeling whimsical.
Come on, teachers, boy? girl? lemur? otter? Hey, maybe I’m a shape shifter!
Pockets! Keys! Call your self a woman!!
Hang on, didn’t this get hashed out 50 years ago? When women were fighting to have access to professional and managerial office jobs, and the right to wear trousers to work, back in the late ’60s/early ’70s, didn’t they all get asked back then if if they didn’t just want to be men? And wasn’t the response a pretty resounding “No, we just want to be women who get to wear trousers and have decent fucking jobs, you stupid asshats!”
Or were all those activist women who’d had enough and were actually standing up for themselves and making their demands heard as loud as they could, still actually being oppressed by the… cisarchy? Or does it just not count as nothing any crusty old second-wave feminists did could possibly have any relevance to anyone anymore?
Karellen, I think the proper answer is that they were trans men and just didn’t know it. s/
Those feminists of the past were accused by their detractors of wanting to be men. Many of today’s feminists think that criticism didn’t go far enough — not only did they want to be men, those feminists must have secretly wanted to be men.
Ah, but it supports the patriarchy instead of questioning the whole damn thing.
For a while there it was starting to look like we’d have to listen to feminists! But luckily this came along and we can go back to “normal.”