Guest post: Are you sure you think it’s fabulous?
Originally a comment by Artymorty on As if women are completely invisible.
I wish more people in the press would stop framing these laws as adding to the rights of trans males, and instead talk about what they really are: laws that take the right away from women to decide for themselves when and how much they’re willing to accommodate trans-identified males in their spaces. The trans lobby pushes the idea that all trans-identified males are genuinely as harmless as women — analogous to gentle, effeminate homosexuals. (I’m picturing that naive cosmologist from yesterday and her “keep being fabulous!” comment and how inappropriate it is to apply the word “fabulous” to the likes of Karen White or Jonathan Yaniv — men who couldn’t possibly be further from the fun-loving “fabulous” purse-collecting, sassy-heels-strutting pseudo-gay stereotype she seems to imagine all transwomen are.) I wish I could talk to people like that cosmologist face-to-face and show them that the majority of trans-identified males maintain behavioural characteristics in line with other males: a higher propensity for violence; a sense of entitlement; etc, etc. I wish I could remind her that in a social context, she already has the right to welcome trans-identified males into her social circles and affirm them as women as she sees fit, and that she should also have the right to not welcome certain trans-identified males if she perceives them as a possible threat, if they make her uncomfortable, or for any other reason.
My favourite example of male-pattern trans behaviour is from last fall: the WSJ undertook a massive exit poll during the US mid-term elections in order to better understand who the hell is still supporting Trump two years into his term. Unsurprisingly, lesbians and gays voted overwhelmingly Democratic. But people who identified as “trans” were far more likely to vote Republican: possibly as many as 40% did, given the margin of error. That’s pretty much in line with non-trans males when you consider that the poll didn’t distinguish between male and female trans-identifiers, and that the female ones are erstwhile-lesbians and thus very unlikely to vote Republican.
I’d like to ask that cosmologist: are you sure you think it’s “fabulous” to legally force women to accommodate everyone in a cohort of middle-aged straight males who tend to be sexually attracted to women, tend to support Donald Trump, are just as likely to commit assault as their non-dress-wearing male counterparts, have no concept of patriarchy and couldn’t care less about feminism?
In related news from yesterday:
https://www.washingtonblade.com/2019/08/15/stunner-log-cabin-endorses-trump-for-re-election/
This set of younger women seems to believe that all or most “trans women” are their sassy gay best friends. I don’t understand why they refuse to see the difference.
I forced myself to listen to a few minutes of the Fresh Air interview with Janet Mock the other day, and in those few minutes there was a clip from the series Mock wrote and it was exactly like that – the trans woman was written to sound just like those sassy gay best friends. Made me grind my teeth.
My impression is that trans identified males are likely to be gun-toting anime characters.
Josh, lots of women have gay male friends now. F you’re trying to be woke and edgy, a trans friend is so much more of a one-up on your other ‘friends’.
Really? How can we quantify that, since even asking the question is forbidden. Those who casually encourage ‘fabulousness’ are blinded to the existence of sever counter examples like White and Yaniv.
They don’t have to be a majority, or more than a tiny minority, to muddy the waters if ‘woke-folk’ refuse to address their existence at all.