Fave sons get first pick
Sure sure, we want more women, definitely, just not right now.
Labour has been warned it could be “going backwards on equality” by two senior MPs who expressed their alarm at the decision not to replace some departing female colleagues with all-women shortlists.
The concerns of Labour MPs Gloria De Piero and Harriet Harman follow criticism of the party’s procedures by the Unison general secretary, Dave Prentis, who accused the Labour leadership of “trading” seats intended for female candidates in order to allow “favourite sons” to take up the safest Labour seats.
De Piero, who has said she will step down as the MP for the hyper-marginal seat of Ashfield at the next election, said she was pleased her seat would be replaced with an all-women shortlist but said she was angered that was not the case in other seats.
Well you see it’s like this, women are so brilliant and talented that they can achieve equality even when they’re only 10% of the total.
Which reminds me of a joke I just made up:
Question:
Why are women 10% of the IT workforce?
Answer:
They need that many to take notes in the meetings.
I wonder if it’s the same in Politics?
Evergreen clip:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OhZRDoGZg00&ab_channel=BBCStudios
What is the point of complaining about no “all women” shortlists in Labour Party? They would just fill those spots with men who claim to be women anyways.