This is what happens when you have #nodebate. Glinner’s Twitter is full of gifs like that. It’s the visual equivalent of “oh yeah? Well you are too, *raspberry*”
Funny how our esteemed blog host became persona non grata for expressing free thought, but those who “terfed her out” still hang around here looking for things to snipe at. Surely they could find a better use for their time?
I guess they have to keep playing at being victims to ensure their status within whatever they have decided to name their community today.
Anyway, I’m off to play in the sun and water, I feel like being a dolphin today.
IDGI. To me, that gif is like a snarky shrug, because there ISN’T anything that can be done about it. IOW, it signifies agreement, not disagreement. How can I tell if I’m wrong?
True. From a friend it would be agreement, from a stranger it would be ambiguous. Really the surprising thing about it is that she bothered responding to me at all; I haven’t heard from her in years (nor vice versa of course). A couple of the people at Skepchick took the time to shit on me when the FTB gang was, so we know they’re on Team MagicGenderPony.
By this using this gif in place of typing out a cogent counterpoint, my assumption is that she has no answer to your point. IN fact that’s what I assume every time I see this sort of response. And if Watson does have a good point to make but refrained from doing so due to say, time constraints, why the attempted mockery? She and others really only have themselves to blame for my assumption.
If it is snark on her part, and it’s probably safe to assume that, then she really knows how to repay you for going to bat for her back when the Elevatorgate shit hit the fan, doesn’t she? But meh. PZ folded like a cheap paper fan on that point, too.
This is what happens when you have #nodebate. Glinner’s Twitter is full of gifs like that. It’s the visual equivalent of “oh yeah? Well you are too, *raspberry*”
So edifying and edumacational.
So according to Watson, we’re supposed to stand around looking like a man who made the mistake of trusting a post-curry fart?
Or not do that? Or wear ugly ties? Or…? I dunno, it’s cryptic.
Well, I’m convinced.
Funny how our esteemed blog host became persona non grata for expressing free thought, but those who “terfed her out” still hang around here looking for things to snipe at. Surely they could find a better use for their time?
I guess they have to keep playing at being victims to ensure their status within whatever they have decided to name their community today.
Anyway, I’m off to play in the sun and water, I feel like being a dolphin today.
IDGI. To me, that gif is like a snarky shrug, because there ISN’T anything that can be done about it. IOW, it signifies agreement, not disagreement. How can I tell if I’m wrong?
True. From a friend it would be agreement, from a stranger it would be ambiguous. Really the surprising thing about it is that she bothered responding to me at all; I haven’t heard from her in years (nor vice versa of course). A couple of the people at Skepchick took the time to shit on me when the FTB gang was, so we know they’re on Team MagicGenderPony.
Recent posts by Watson make it clear she hasn’t changed her position on the issue.
By this using this gif in place of typing out a cogent counterpoint, my assumption is that she has no answer to your point. IN fact that’s what I assume every time I see this sort of response. And if Watson does have a good point to make but refrained from doing so due to say, time constraints, why the attempted mockery? She and others really only have themselves to blame for my assumption.
If it is snark on her part, and it’s probably safe to assume that, then she really knows how to repay you for going to bat for her back when the Elevatorgate shit hit the fan, doesn’t she? But meh. PZ folded like a cheap paper fan on that point, too.