About the risk of exposure
In a previously undisclosed secret mission in 2017, the United States successfully extracted from Russia one of its highest-level covert sources inside the Russian government, multiple Trump administration officials with direct knowledge told CNN.
A person directly involved in the discussions said that the removal of the Russian was driven, in part, by concerns that President Donald Trump and his administration repeatedly mishandled classified intelligence and could contribute to exposing the covert source as a spy.
The decision to carry out the extraction occurred soon after a May 2017 meeting in the Oval Office in which Trump discussed highly classified intelligence with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and then-Russian Ambassador to the US Sergey Kislyak. The intelligence, concerning ISIS in Syria, had been provided by Israel.
The disclosure to the Russians by the President, though not about the Russian spy specifically, prompted intelligence officials to renew earlier discussions about the potential risk of exposure, according to the source directly involved in the matter.
So, that’s breathtaking, if it’s true.
Pompeo was still the CIA director then, and he told other Trump admin people that too much information was coming out about the spy.
A spokesman for Pompeo declined to comment. The White House press secretary lied.
The removal happened at a time of wide concern in the intelligence community about mishandling of intelligence by Trump and his administration. Those concerns were described to CNN by five sources who served in the Trump administration, intelligence agencies and Congress.
Those concerns continued to grow in the period after Trump’s Oval Office meeting with Kislyak and Lavrov. Weeks after the decision to extract the spy, in July 2017, Trump met privately with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the G20 summit in Hamburg and took the unusual step of confiscating the interpreter’s notes.
I remember that. Why was nothing done about it? It’s insane.
Afterward, intelligence officials again expressed concern that the President may have improperly discussed classified intelligence with Russia, according to an intelligence source with knowledge of the intelligence community’s response to the Trump-Putin meeting.
Of course they did, because how could they possibly be confident that he hadn’t? When he talked to Putin alone and made sure no written record survived?
Knowledge of the Russian covert source’s existence was highly restricted within the US government and intelligence agencies. According to one source, there was “no equal alternative” inside the Russian government, providing both insight and information on Putin.
So, first of all, we have a president who can’t be trusted not to share intel with Putin, and then, we’re deprived of a top value source of intel on Putin because that same president can’t be trusted not to burn said source.
It doesn’t get much better than that.
We knew it. He’s the first President in history to be a major security risk: the first President who should be denied any security clearances at all. If he were in any other position, he would never have gotten one. He’s effectively one massive leak, and an asset for every hostile power in the world.
So how long before we see a polonium attack on US soil? Ug…
I’ve been watching the House of Commons duke it out over brexit and I’ve beginning to think we’re seeing the end of democracy in this new age of techno-populism.
The fact that Valerie Plame announced her candidacy for a House seat in New Mexico (with a quite clever campaign ad) the same day CNN published this story is surely no coincidence. Or if it is, never has the phrase “a coincidence that beggars the imagination” been more apt.