A ruling
Back in June I did a post about a lawsuit by a trans woman against the Times.
The hearing at the Edinburgh Employment Tribunal, which began on Wednesday, could have far-reaching implications for UK’s news outlets. In addition to the standard employment law charges such as discrimination and victimisation, the case also rests on an argument that has never before been tested.
O’Donnell and her lawyer — Robin White of Old Square Chambers — allege that it wasn’t just what happened in the newsroom but also what those inside it published in the newspaper about trans people that constituted a hostile, anti-transgender place to work.
Sly. Very very sly. Bring one case and (if you win) make it so that the news media can no longer write or broadcast anything critical of trans activism or trans ideology. Wouldn’t that be awesome.
A transgender former journalist at The Times has lost an employment tribunal claim that she was the victim of discrimination and unfair dismissal.
Katherine O’Donnell had claimed that there was a “toxic environment for trans people” at the newspaper and criticised its reporting of transgender stories.
…
John Witherow, the editor of The Times, appeared as a witness at the tribunal and defended the paper’s coverage of transgender issues. He denied that there was bias or inaccuracy in its reporting.
Judge Jane Porter dismissed Ms O’Donnell’s claims of direct discrimination, harassment, victimisation and unfair dismissal after hearings that lasted a total of 19 days. In her judgment she wrote: “The tribunal does not accept the evidence of a ‘boys club’ during the claimant’s employment . . . there was a significant number of senior women in powerful positions.”
A spokeswoman for The Times said: “We are pleased this judgment dismisses all the claims made by the claimant and confirms that The Times took reasonable and appropriate decisions and did not show any anti-transgender bias towards its staff.”
I don’t think trans women should be complaining about boys’ clubs as applied to themselves.
The game’s RIGGED! They’re all boring, natal women and probably a bunch of TERFs to boot. It would only count if they were Brave and Stunning, Womanlier-than-Women trans women.
Thank fuck, that would have had incredibly far reaching consequences.
Had it gone the other way, I mean.
I’m pretty sure you can only be Brave & Stunning if you buy the TRA line in its entirety.