With the face of a pig
Trump has always called women dogs, so lighten up already. Gail Collins is one of those women:
Hey, it was long ago, but it still comes up. Particularly now that we’re making lists of all the women our president has ever compared to a canine. Back when I worked for New York Newsday, he sent me a copy of a column I’d written, scrawled with objections, along with an announcement that I was “a dog and a liar” and that my picture was “the face of a pig.” At the time, he was only a flailing real estate developer trying to make a deal with the city, yet it still seemed so weird that at first I wondered if it might be a joke, or some enemy of Trump’s trying to embarrass him. But no, it was a missive from the man himself.
She thought it couldn’t be at first because normal adults don’t act like that. Period. An adult who sends personal abuse to a total stranger is badly broken somewhere. Trump has always been badly broken.
This week, of course, Trump referred to his ex-friend Omarosa in a tweet as “that dog.” I am going to go out on a limb and say that when the president of the United States insults a woman that way in a public statement, it’s a little bit more of an issue.
One that will never go away. As the temperatures rise and the forests burn and the crops fail, it will still be the case that the US once had a hateful bully as a president.
One of the worst things about this moment in our national lives is the fear that if Trump gets into trouble for doing something dumb and obnoxious, he’ll respond by doing something huge and maybe dangerous. Have you heard that Stormy Daniels is going to be on the British version of “Celebrity Big Brother”? What happens if she tells that story about a hotel room spanking session to a house full of smirking Europeans? He could declare a war.
Or not even declare a war but just do a Pearl Harbor and drop a few nukes on someone.
During the campaign Trump continually pointed out that he went to the Wharton School of Business. (“It’s like super genius stuff.”) That gave many people the impression he’d gotten the high-prestige Wharton M.B.A., but he was really just a transfer student into the undergraduate program. Skeptics suggested he only edged his way in because of family connections. He graduated without any honors or distinction, and went on to publish a best-selling memoir that was written by somebody else.
I’m betting there were no dogs in it.
This sort of account is actually why I am a touch leery of the way most left leaning outlets are taking the dog comment as a racist slur. Dog is his go-to word for anywoman that he dislikes.
(A small consolation, all it really means is he is more at ease in displaying his contempt for women than his contempt for black people.)
Not sure if that makes him a better* person or not.
* Better being a relative term given his absolute ranking in the bottom decile of decent human ranking.
@Holms – that doesn’t necessarily make it less racist. Just because someone might call a group of thuggish white people a bunch of apes, would not make it less racist if they called a group of PoC the same thing.
A word or phrase isn’t racist because of some inherent magical property that it has, but because of its history as a tool of oppression against a specific set of people. That history means that a given word or phrase can literally have different meanings depending on who is saying it, and who they’re saying it to. That’s also why marginalised people can “take back” language that’s been used to oppress them, but deny that language to the class of people who have historically used it to marginalise them.
Trump calling a white woman a dog doesn’t make it less racist when he calls a woman of colour a dog, because calling a white woman a dog doesn’t erase all the rest of its history as a tool of marginalisation.
And if that’s just his go-to language, well, it fucking shouldn’t be. We should demand that world leaders understand the power of words, and all their varied meanings, and be careful and circumspect in their use of language. Trump should not get a pass for being semi-literate with a limited vocabulary. Heck, not so long ago he kept boasting that “being presidential” was *easy*. If that’s the case, why the fuck doesn’t he do it more often?
Sorry, I think I got a bit off-topic towards the end there :-/
“Dog” meaning “ugly woman” has been used against all women for a long time.
^ That’s what I was thinking, it’s the default meaning when dog is used to describe a person here in the .au.