Such a starkly disproportionate impact
That Georgia county that’s planning to close 7 of its 9 polling places is getting a lot of attention from civil rights groups.
The closures would come just before a high-stakes midterm election in which Stacey Abrams, a black woman, is the Democratic nominee for governor.
“This is nothing more than a racially motivated, voter suppression scheme that aims to lock Black voters out of a historic election cycle,” Kristen Clarke, who leads the Lawyers’ Committee on Civil Rights Under Law, tweeted on Sunday. The Lawyers’ Committee, representing three Georgia civil rights groups, sent a letter to the Randolph County Board of Elections and Registration threatening legal action if the plan moves forward.
It’s a rural county, with no public transportation, and a majority-black population.
Some residents would have to travel more than 10 miles to vote in a county that lacks public transportation. According to the Census Bureau, the county is more than 60 percent black, and 30 percent of residents live in poverty, nearly twice Georgia’s 16 percent statewide poverty rate.
Last week, the Georgia chapter of the ACLU likewise threatened legal action against the county. In a letter, the group pointed out that the transportation difficulties of reaching a polling location would fall disproportionately on the county’s poor, black, rural voters. “When polling place configurations or closures have such a starkly disproportionate impact on racial minorities or lower-income rural voters without transportation, such closures almost certainly constitute a violation of the Voting Rights Act or the United States Constitution,” the letter warned.
That kind of crap used to be absolutely routine in the South, and that’s why Johnson pushed for the Voting Rights Act.
The election board defended its plan at two contentious public meetings last week, according to the local Fox affiliate. A consultant hired by the board explained that the seven locations slated for closure are not compliant with the Americans With Disabilities Act, and the board doesn’t have time to fix the problem before the election. The Lawyers’ Committee, finding the justification unreasonable, submitted a public records request in order to acquire information about how the board reached its decision. Georgia’s secretary of state, Brian Kemp, who is also the Republican nominee for governor, issued a statement urging the county to abandon the plan; Abrams likewise announced her opposition.
The plan to close these precincts was made possible by the Supreme Court, which in 2013 struck down a provision of the Voting Rights Act that required jurisdictions with a history of racial discrimination to clear changes to voting procedures with the federal government. In his decision, Chief Justice John Roberts said that the South had changed since the law passed in 1965, and that the burden of clearing changes with the government was no longer necessary.
Ha. Ha ha ha fucking ha.
So, the answer to polling stations which might be inaccessible to Americans with disabilities is…
…tada! To make them inaccessible to everyone else, too.
Ummm… do they really think that everyone else can’t see the problem with that?
To be fair I think there are situations in which legally people are better off shutting a facility down (temporarily) rather than keeping a non-compliant one open. But yeah, in this case that’s not looking at all plausible. As someone pointed out in the article, they were non-compliant before, too, yet the county didn’t shut them down until now…when a black woman is the Dem candidate for governor. Mmhmm.
Shutting down a non-compliant facility, in order to move the polling to a compliant one, is a sensible move. But shutting it – and most of the others – down, without replacing them? Criminal.