Run away from the subscriber in Albemarle
Allison Meier at Hyperallergic tells us about a database project to collect fugitive slave ads, which are themselves a source of information on slaves and slavery.
Readers of the May 24, 1796 Pennsylvania Gazette found an advertisement offering ten dollars to any person who would apprehend Oney Judge, an enslaved woman who had fled from President George Washington’s Virginia plantation, Mount Vernon. The notice described her in detail as a “light mulatto girl, much freckled, with very black eyes and bushy black hair,” as well as her skills at mending clothes, and that she “may attempt to escape by water … it is probable she will attempt to pass as a free woman, and has, it is said, wherewithal to pay her passage.” She did indeed board a ship called the Nancy and made it to New Hampshire, where she later married a free black sailor, although she was herself never freed by the Washingtons and remained a fugitive.
The advertisement is one of thousands that were printed in newspapers during colonial and pre-Civil War slavery in the United States. The Freedom on the Move (FOTM) public database project, now being developed at Cornell University, is the first major digital database to organize together North American fugitive slave ads from regional, state, and other collections. FOTM recently received its second of its two National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) digital humanities grants.
So I went to Freedom on the Move.
Throughout the 250-year history of slavery in North America, enslaved people tried to escape. Once newspapers were common, enslavers posted “runaway ads” to try to locate these fugitives. Such ads provide significant quantities of individual and collective information about the economic, demographic, social, and cultural history of slavery, but they have never been systematically collected. We are designing and beginning data collection for a database that will compile all North American slave runaway ads and make them available for statistical, geographical, textual, and other forms of analysis. Some elements of data collection will be crowdsourced, engendering a public sense of co-participation in the process of recording history, and producing a living pedagogical tool for instructors at all levels, in multiple disciplines.
The ads of course provide a very focused and limited kind of information – the kind that would guide strangers in picking them out as “fugitive slaves.” Historians are used to that kind of thing.
Between the seventeenth century and 1865, millions of African-American people were enslaved in the thirteen colonies and the United States. One of the most common ways to resist slavery was to escape. At one point or another, hundreds of thousands of enslaved people tried to run away.
When fugitives escaped, enslavers often placed runaway notices in newspapers. Such ads included any kind of information that might help readers identify the fugitive: the name, height, build, appearance, clothing, literacy level, language, accent and so on of the runaway. Often the ads speculate on where the escapee might be headed and why, when they were most recently sold, and what kinds of scars and marks they had.
Each ad sketches the contours of an individual life, a personality, a story. Taken collectively, the ads constitute a detailed, concentrated, and incredibly rare source of information about a population that is notably absent from most official historical records of the time. We are fortunate that there are an estimated 100,000 or more runaway ads in newspapers that survive from the colonial and pre-Civil War U.S.
If we could collect and collate all of these ads, and make the information in them accessible, we would create what might be the single richest source of data possible for understanding the lives of the approximately eight million people who were enslaved in the history of the U.S.
Semi-OT: I was up all night one night messing around with this database:
https://www.ucl.ac.uk/lbs/
Not directly related to my area of historical research, but I got a much better understanding of how the English Industrial Revolution was actually funded.
Bad enough to read the ads. Then the big smack upside the head to see who posted them. I mean, I *knew* some of the Founding Dads had slaves. It’s still weird to see that, wow, those polite gentlemen kept slaves.
And put out notices when they escaped.
I’ve read a fair bit about Jefferson and slavery, but still that advert was jarring.
The details show how NOT impersonal slave ownership was. Jefferson and Washington, or their managers, knew the fugitives as people, not some dark mass. The left-handed alcoholic shoemaker, the would-be fashion plate, the ‘Dutch’ speaking fiddler. To keep them in bondage, the details of their humanity are allowed recognition.
Brilliant point.
Yes, it is comforting to think that the founding fathers kept slaves because they didn’t think of them as people; but, in fact, they knew that they were people and kept them enslaved anyway. They simply also ‘knew’ that, as wealthy white men, they were superior and were entitled, by God, to treat other people any way they wished.
The same mindset – intrinsic white male superiority – is keeping women from equality of treatment, and black people in poverty. And everything they see at the cinema, and read in books, magazines, newspapers and online, reinforces the idea that the White Male is the pinnacle of creation (or evolution, if they are atheists) and everyone else is inferior and has to bow to them. It might be because I recently watched ‘Guardians of the Galaxy’ (in short chunks over several days, because it is far too awful to watch in a sitting) but I have been stewing over the appalling stereotypes since, and noticing them more and more in other places. Ugh.
Well they did and didn’t. It’s a vagueness problem maybe – like how big is big, how much bigger is very big, how many bits does it take to make a heap, how many missing hairs does it take to equal bald, etc. There were some defenders of slavery who at least claimed that Africans weren’t people the way whites were people, whether they actually believed it or not, and a great many claimed that they were (uniformly, as a group, without exception) far less intelligent and capable of autonomy. (Many people to this day believe that about women.) Jefferson claimed that, Lincoln sort of claimed it. People are horribly good at believing things that justify exploitation.