Imbecilic hackery

Dec 13th, 2018 | By Ophelia Benson
Category: Notes and Comment Blog

https://twitter.com/Popehat/status/1073329533347016705

https://twitter.com/Popehat/status/1073330088677003265

https://twitter.com/Popehat/status/1073330540546220032

https://twitter.com/Popehat/status/1073331035633418240

https://twitter.com/Popehat/status/1073331546004672513

https://twitter.com/Popehat/status/1073332967169114112

https://twitter.com/Popehat/status/1073333800459894784

https://twitter.com/JamesFallows/status/1073331240638537728

H/t Screechy Monkey

#1
Latverian Diplomat
December 14, 2018 at 6:16 am

FWIW, while the actual reporting in the WSJ is respuatable, the editorial page has been blatantly biased and dishonest for decades. Last time I checked, the real WSJ is behind a pay wall, while the editorial content is free to access. This is not a happenstance.

This distinction should be better known, I guess.
#2
G Felis
December 14, 2018 at 3:23 pm

The WSJ editorial page was a cesspool of extreme far right hackery for decades BEFORE it was purchased by Rupert Murdoch’s media empire. Cataloguing outright lies, distortions, subtle (and not so subtle) racism, and just plain stupidity in WSJ editorials would be a full-time job.