Every man certainly should be worried
Alexandra Petri wrote this scorching parody yesterday, and I regret not reading it until just now. (A whole day lost!)
“If somebody can be brought down by accusations like this, then you, me, every man certainly should be worried.”
— A lawyer close to the White House, speaking to PoliticoLook, who among us?
If, apparently, a single alleged assault at a single party decades ago is to be frowned upon, then no man is safe, right?
What’s next? You can’t harass a colleague and serve on the Supreme Court? You can’t pick up high schoolers outside custody hearings and serve in the Senate? You can’t have a meat locker full of female femurs and expect to breeze through your confirmation as interior secretary?
Right? Won’t somebody at last think of the men and boys before it’s too late?
I wonder if she too saw Tom Nichols’s tweets and was inspired by them.
This is a good point, but all I care about in this is whether we're establishing a new precedent that 35 year old accusations of things you did as a minor are now fair game as political weapons in DC. If so, okay, but no complaining when it happens again after this – as it will. https://t.co/T0LKE3HgiJ
— Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) September 16, 2018
“Things you did as a minor.” It’s funny (i.e. infuriating) how consistently he veiled it, how adamantly he refused to say “35 year old accusations of assaulting a teenage girl” in all that fretting about precedents.
Back to Petri:
This isn’t just my worry. This isn’t just something horrible I am now revealing about myself. This is an every-man problem.
If suddenly, as a country, we decide that violently attempting to assault someone is, like, bad, then that knocks out 98, maybe 99 percent of men, just going off the locker-room talk I’ve heard.
Look, which of us is 100 percent certain all his sexual encounters are consensual? That isn’t most people’s baseline, surely? You’re telling me I am supposed to encounter dozens, hundreds, thousands of women in my life, some drunk and some sober and some with really good legs and just … not assault any of them?
It’s funny, in a bitter way, but it’s also real.
I mean, it’s not as though they’re people, are they? At the moment of conception, yes, but then they come out Daughters, not people! They grow into objects; some become Wives or Mothers, others Hags or Crones. Then they die! If they were people, we would not expect dominion over their bodies, surely; if they were people, we would not feel entitled to their smiles. If they were people, I could read a novel with a female protagonist and not be instantly confused and alarmed.
No. They are an unintelligible something else. They are to be put on pedestals, as John Kelly urges, or groped, as the president urges. They are impervious to cold, capable of wearing a bikini on the most frigid day to please us; they can run great distances in heels without discomfort; they were created for us from a rib and designed as our companion. If they have wants of their own, there is really no way of knowing.
And even if they do have wants of their own, those wants are rudimentary and shallow, and forgotten in an instant. They may seem to struggle and resist when we throw them onto beds and jump on top of them, cover their screaming mouths with our hands, and drag their clothes off, but actually it’s just a reflex, with no connection to anything going on in their tiny smooth brains.
If assault renders a man unfit to serve on the Supreme Court, then how are we to discern the Founders’ intent? I mean, Jefferson, hello? And what is going to become of the presidency? Who wants to live in that world?
Every man should be worried. If boys cannot be boys, then how can boys be men who rise to the highest offices in the land? If this stops being something you can get away with, then will anyone still be above the law?
Yeah, I don’t see this whole move getting anywhere.
No, this is not a new precedent.
Ted Kennedy found out that he could never be president because of Chappaquiddick.
Yes, but Kennedy was a D-E-M-O-C-R-A-T.
(Not that I think that made any difference back then, but it would make a difference NOW as the Republicans have thrown pretty much all principals that aren’t over-ridden by double standards overboard.)
That first line sounds like something by Tammy Wynette
Some of us manage both. I think I straddle the line nicely. ;-)
Ted Kennedy couldn’t become president, but Clarence Thomas could join the Supreme Court and rule against women’s rights all these years.
And it’s likely that Chappaquiddick was actually an accident – a drunken accident, a stupid accident, an irresponsible accident, but an accident. To me the disqualifying thing about that was the awful, insensitive, and politically motivated attempts to cover it up and put the complicity somewhere other than Ted.
Brett Kavanaugh was drunk, but there the resemblance ends. It is not possible to do what he did by accident. It was an on-purpose act of a drunken, entitled boy who grew into an entitled man (well, that’s pretty much the deal with Ted, too, except he was already a man when Chappaquiddick).
The arguments people are making for Kavanaugh sound eerily similar to the defenses of Roy Moore – but I fear the outcome will be different. The voters made short work of Roy Moore, but the Congress is making this decision, and not likely to ask the voters, at least some of whom quail at sexual assault patterns in their leaders.
Really? He got more than 60% of the votes of white women. His behavior, and Kavanaugh’s are barely distinguishable from ‘normal’ in the circles they travel.
John, I guess I was referring to the fact that he lost. But he is in an area with a lot of minority voters. And I think that habit of so many white women is disgusting. My mother was that way – if she suspected that someone had any feminist sympathies, they were out for her.
Why have so many women drunk the Kool-Aid? I blame the fact that we were brought up to drink the Kool-Aid, so perhaps the better question is, how did so many (in this case, 40%) resist drinking the Kool-Aid, even when it is dressed up with whipping cream and marshmallows to pretend it is appealing?
As an historical and I believe relevant service: take it or leave it.
http://www.butterfliesandwheels.org/2018/the-reality-of-being-born-female/
Relevant how?
As is common in such cases, it is his word against hers. Except that at stake here is a seat for Kavanaugh on the US Supreme Court. And against him (at least in the view of a detached observer like say, me) is the fact that he is President Pussygrabber’s nominee. In other times and situations this would likely result in Kav being passed over for the next contestant in this game show, simply because he is under a cloud. And let’s face it, Trump would have at least one million more well-qualified US lawyers to pick from: ‘on behalf of the nation’, of course. And for the Senate to confirm from. And it would be Trump who would have to do the passing-over in the nomination phase: perhaps beyond a reasonable expectation.
But for some, it would be a lay-down misere. Because rape culture.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/sep/19/brett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-accusation-what-happens-next