Boasting in strikingly playground terms
The Times on Trump’s witty and tactful overture to North Korea yesterday:
President Trump again raised the prospect of nuclear war with North Korea, boasting in strikingly playground terms on Tuesday night that he commands a “much bigger” and “more powerful” arsenal of devastating weapons than the outlier government in Asia.
CNN last night was doing a lot of underlining of the dick-waving aspect – which was triple, let’s not forget, bigger and more powerful AND IT WORKS.
This of course was just as South Korea was suggesting talks with the North, so there’s that punch the ally aspect as well.
The president’s tone also generated a mix of scorn and alarm among lawmakers, diplomats and national security experts who called it juvenile and frightening for a president handling a foreign policy challenge with world-wrecking consequences. The language was reminiscent of Mr. Trump’s boast during the 2016 presidential campaign that his hands, and by extension his genitals, were in fact big enough.
Dick-waving. That’s our head of state.
It came on a day when Mr. Trump, back in Washington from his Florida holiday break, effectively opened his new year with a barrage of provocative tweets on a host of issues. He called for an aide to Hillary Clinton to be thrown in jail, threatened to cut off aid to Pakistan and the Palestinians, assailed Democrats over immigration, claimed credit for the fact that no one died in a jet plane crash last year and announced that he would announce his own award next Monday for the most dishonest and corrupt news media.
Holiday over; work resumed.
Mr. Trump’s supporters brushed off the criticism, calling the president’s words a bracing stand that would force North Korea to confront the potential repercussions of its efforts to develop nuclear weapons that could reach the continental United States.
Oh please. Do they think North Korea doesn’t know we have more nukes than they do?
Many security experts have said there is no reasonable military option for restraining North Korea that would not involve unacceptable loss of life, which is one reason South Korea’s president, Moon Jae-in, is more eager for dialogue. But Mr. Trump and his national security adviser, Lt. Gen. H. R. McMaster, have argued that there is a viable military alternative.
Welll that’s putting it euphemistically. What they really mean is that Trump doesn’t think there is such a thing as unacceptable loss of life, as long as the lives lost are far away and foreign.
Trump also believes that diplomacy is for sissies, and he doesn’t plan to be a sissy. He’ll just hide in a fallout shelter once the bombs start flying, but that’s not going to be wimpy, no sir, because he is too important to lose, so he’ll sacrifice his freedom for the sake of the free world. But his shelter will have all the ice cream.
“…he doesn’t plan to be a sissy”
If his performance during the total eclipse of the sun is any indication, he’ll stare into the heart of the nuclear blast, protective eyewear be damned.