Blue apron full of holes and covered in cat food
Of course. Trump and his gang want to get rid of food stamps and replace them with a box of “staples” of the kind that exclude all perishables i.e. fresh vegetables and fruit, milk, cheese, eggs – you know, anything you’d actually want to eat.
The Trump administration wants to slash food aid to low-income families and make up the difference with a box of canned goods — a change that Office of Management and budget director Mick Mulvaney described in a Monday briefing as a “Blue Apron-type program.”
“What we do is propose that for folks who are on food stamps, part — not all, part — of their benefits come in the actual sort of, and I don’t want to steal somebody’s copyright, but a Blue Apron-type program where you actually receive the food instead of receive the cash,” Mulvaney said. “It lowers the cost to us because we can buy [at wholesale prices] whereas they have to buy it at retail. It also makes sure they’re getting nutritious food. So we’re pretty excited about that.”
What a grotesque lie. A box of canned goods is nothing like Blue Apron and it’s also far from the best way to get nutritious food.
On Monday, the Trump administration proposed cutting food stamps, formally known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, by $17 billion in 2019 and more than $213 billion over the next decade. The dramatic reductions came as part of a budget proposal that made sweeping, across-the-board cuts to popular safety net programs,including federal housing subsidies and Medicaid.
This is who and what they are: make the poor poorer and the rich richer. That’s their emaciated version of A Better World.
[U]nder the Trump proposal, which the Agriculture Department has dubbed “America’s Harvest Box,” all households receiving more than $90 per month in benefits — 81 percent of SNAP households overall — would begin receiving about half their benefits in the form of government-purchased, nonperishable food items.
Those foods would include shelf-stable milk, juice, grains, cereals, pasta, peanut butter, beans and canned meat, fruits and vegetables, according to the USDA. The department estimates that it could supply these goods at about half the cost of retail, slashing the cost of SNAP while still feeding the hungry.
“USDA America’s Harvest Box is a bold, innovative approach to providing nutritious food to people who need assistance feeding themselves and their families – and all of it is home grown by American farmers and producers,” Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue said in a statement. “It maintains the same level of food value as SNAP participants currently receive, provides states flexibility in administering the program, and is responsible to the taxpayers.”
No it doesn’t. Canned fruits and vegetables are no substitute for fresh ones.
Many anti-hunger advocates and analysts are equally skeptical of the proposed “food box,” which — if approved — would affect 16.4 million households. They say it’s unclear how USDA would deliver the boxes and how much that would cost. Equally unclear is whether USDA would allot the same foods to, say, an elderly diabetic and a family with young children.
“It boggles the mind how that would play out,” said Kathy Fisher, policy director at Philadelphia’s Coalition Against Hunger. “We know SNAP works now, when people can choose what they need. How they would distribute foods to people with specialized diets, or [to people in] rural areas … It’s very expensive and very complicated.”
It’s punitive. That’s the only point, really – telling poor people they’re worthless and bad and deserve nothing better than canned spinach and stale pasta.
This isn’t the most apt comparison but this proposal immediately reminded me of the ration supply chain to indigenous peoples imprisoned on reservations, and we all know there was NO corruption or abuse rife in every step of that program oh heavens no. If this happens the choice of vendors will be very telling. Just another attempt to shame people without money for wanting to eat something palatable. Speaking of imprisonment, what does the food services economy in prisons look like?
Will the box include Grog? Rum, cane sugar and lime? It’s supposed to help avoid scurvy. ARRrr
I’ve got a peanut allergy (and when I was a kid, an allergy to all legumes). Pretty much every item on that list is problematic. The logistics of keeping track of who can’t get what would be a nightmare.
Thing is, they could probably make something like this work in a way that would reduce costs and increase convenience to recipients. Grocery delivery would be a handy thing for a lot of SNAP recipients; I know the walk to and from grocery stores was an issue for me when I was receiving them and living alone and without transportation. Even sticking to less perishable items and/or locally sourced perishables as part of someone’s food package would be all right – certainly much of one’s staples can usefully be that. But it’d require recipient choice, something that simple cash-value benefits assures and this, as described, does not.
If you had, say, some online or voicemail based order system – much like you may have for home delivery drugs – they could still improve costs and/or convenience and address the differing needs issue. But that’d take an administration that was thoughtful.
I volunteered with a food bank in the ’80s that provided a monthly bag of staples to people on public assistance. We solicited funds from the public in addition to actual food donations, so we could buy food from wholesalers. These bags of groceries were only intended to tide people over when their benefits ran out. We had no illusion that we were defeating hunger, or that these were a substitute for (or superior to) fresh food.
I guess they want to keep all those SNAP recipients from buying lobster.
Yes. Because every food basket I ever received was dominated by green beans, the one vegetable I will not eat. And it is no more expensive, nor healthier, if I were to choose green peas over green beans, or even, say, black beans, which are yummy and nutritious…especially if you get the dried ones and cook them all day in a slow cooker with a little seasoning (oh, wait, I don’t imagine seasoning would be something they would let people have, right? Because, like, luxury?).
And peanut butter? Seriously? What is it about government people that when they think about healthy food for kids they have to come up with the single most inedible, awful, disgusting food item they can? Is peanut butter even edible?
For some of us it’s deadly.
Honestly, I’m surprised they aren’t just proposing to send the poor a box of Nutraloaf
These rich guys are just begging to be eaten. Eat the rich! Eat the rich!
Peanut butter is a cheap protein that keeps well and can be slapped on bread and eaten without anything required to heat it, or munched up without even the bread if need be. If you’re thinking in terms of what people can use without slow cookers, stovetops, cookware, or even a fridge, and that can keep a long while, peanut butter’s got some virtue.
Mostly though, I think it’s harkening back to some golden age of yesteryear in which food recipients weren’t trusted with anything that could be treated much like cash, and received precisely what they would eat with no choice at all. It’s not about economy, it’s about bringing back the 1950’s. The selection in the 1950’s had some logic to it – heck, it likely goes back to wartime rationing plans and bomb shelter fare – but it’s not logic that carries over too well to 2018, when you can expect anyone with an address at least to have access to a fridge. (And unlike in the 1950’s, it’s not a damn luxury item.)
Nutraloaf? I’m surprised they haven’t suggested Brawndo. It’s got what poor people need!
Soylent Green!
What a Maroon, they don’t get Soylent Green, they get to be Soylent Green.
But everybody knows that the poor spend their benefits on cigarettes, drugs, booze, plasma tv’s, computers, cars…..anything but food. That kind Mr. Trump just wants to be sure that all those beautiful little black babies and cute trailer park American kids get some food in their bellies.
God bless ya, Mr. Trump, sir, and God bless us, everyone.
Except food stamps are already very strictly confined to essential food and nothing else – no alcohol, no junk food, no luxury food. Even Trump knows that much, so this is a move to prevent them from buying good and healthy food and to make sure they get only nasty inedible shit.
Loosely related, I hope that’s o.k.: Considering the “why” for the republicans party policies, have you seen this article:
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/02/gop-used-two-santa-clauses-tactic-con-america-nearly-40-years/
I think it very clearly explains why the GOP does what it does and how it gets away with it.