An unorthodox campaign
This seems skeevy enough for anyone’s taste.
Lobbyists representing the Saudi government reserved blocks of rooms at President Trump’s Washington, D.C., hotel within a month of Trump’s election in 2016 — paying for an estimated 500 nights at the luxury hotel in just three months, according to organizers of the trips and documents obtained by The Washington Post.
At the time, these lobbyists were reserving large numbers of D.C.-area hotel rooms as part of an unorthodox campaign that offered U.S. military veterans a free trip to Washington — then sent them to Capitol Hill to lobby against a law the Saudis opposed, according to veterans and organizers.
Hey, great, using military veterans to lobby for a law on behalf of Saudi fucking Arabia. While shunting money to Donald Trump.
The lobbyists spent more than $270,000 on Trump’s hotel.
Those bookings have fueled a pair of federal lawsuits alleging Trump violated the Constitution by taking improper payments from foreign governments.
During this period, records show, the average nightly rate at the hotel was $768. The lobbyists who ran the trips say they chose Trump’s hotel strictly because it offered a discount from that rate and had rooms available, not to curry favor with Trump.
“Absolutely not. It had nothing to do with that. Not one bit,” said Michael Gibson, a Maryland-based political operative who helped organize the trips.
Is that credible? No.
“It made all the sense in the world, when we found out that the Saudis had paid for it,” said Henry Garcia, a Navy veteran from San Antonio who went on three trips. He said the organizers never said anything about Saudi Arabia when they invited him.
He believed the trips were organized by other veterans, but that puzzled him, because this group spent money like no veterans group he had ever worked with. There were private hotel rooms, open bars, free dinners. Then, Garcia said, one of the organizers who had been drinking minibar champagne mentioned a Saudi prince.
“I said, ‘Oh, we were just used to give Trump money,’ ” Garcia said.
That and lobby against a law on behalf of the Saudis. Win-win.
These transactions have become ammunition for plaintiffs in two lawsuits alleging that Trump violated the Constitution’s foreign emoluments clause by taking payments from foreign governments. On Tuesday, the attorneys general in Maryland and the District subpoenaed 13 Trump business entities and 18 competing businesses, largely in search of records of foreign spending at the hotel.
What’s the law the Saudis were so opposed to?
In late September [2016], Congress had overridden a veto from President Barack Obama and passed a law the Saudis vehemently opposed: the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, called JASTA. The new law, backed by the families of Sept. 11 victims, opened the door to costly litigation alleging that the Saudi government bore some blame. Of the 19 hijackers involved in the attacks, 15 were Saudi citizens.
Oh, that law.
In response, the Saudis tried something new. To battle one of America’s most revered groups — the Sept. 11 families — they recruited allies from another.
They went looking for veterans.
But they did it via a US lobbying firm and without telling the veterans what it was all about.
The lobbyist company (Quora) tells an absurd story in which for the first couple of jaunts they put the veterans up at a Westin in Crystal City, but then next time the Westin was all booked, everything was all booked, so “out of the blue” they decided to try the Trump hotel. Trump Hotel had vacancies; fabulous, do you give veterans discounts? Why yes we do, said Trump Hotel, so the deal was done and they stuck with Trump Hotel thereafter. I don’t believe a word of that. If Trump Hotel really averages $768 a night a discount that would get them close to the Westin would be one hell of a discount. Trump doesn’t give his money away, he puts it in his own pocket.
Veterans who attended these trips said a few things surprised them.
One was how good their group seemed to be at spending money.
“We’ve done hundreds of veterans events, and we’ve stayed in Holiday Inns and eaten Ritz Crackers and lemonade. And we’re staying in this hotel that costs $500 a night,” said Dan Cord, a Marine veteran. “I’d never seen anything like this. They were like, ‘That’s what’s so cool! Drink on us.’ ”
Because hey it all goes to Trump so what could be better?!
Also the lobbying was inept. It was the wrong time of year, they weren’t prepped, they were sent to talk to people like Grassley who had already made up their minds.
Another problem: In some cases, congressional staffers confronted them because they knew who was funding these trips.
Even if the veterans did not.
“We’d walk in there, and they’d go, ‘Are you the veterans that are getting bribed?’ ” Suesakul said.
Awkward.
Meanwhile, Trump continues to disbelieve reports that say the Saudis cut Jamal Khashoggi into pieces while he was still alive.
For what? At that price, I should have a view of the Columbia River gorge with nothing in the way to spoil it, plus the most comfortable bed in the world, plus totally free meals at the country’s finest restaurants, plus free booze (which apparently they got, but I suspect it was not provided free by the hotel, but paid by the Saudis), plus a library containing all my favorite books, plus all my favorite movies to pick from, plus a paid escort who would give me massages on demand, plus hot chocolate running out the water taps, plus…I could go on, because all of that together still wouldn’t be enough to induce me to pay nearly $800 a night for an overhyped hotel. And there are few things that could get me to put out any amount of money, no matter how small, for something with the Trump name on it.
Oh, just in case someone misunderstands – I do know the Columbia River Gorge is not in Washington, D. C. That’s merely a statement of my own priorities, the type of place I would prefer to be.
Good grief, why do people let themselves be used so easily?
I don’t know which is the case, but in writing from the left I see both these claims made:
1. Trump’s wealth is greatly exaggerated, and he owns almost nothing. His name is just a brand the actual owners use.
2. The Saudis, etc., use Trump properties because they know he profits greatly from it so it’s an easy way to indirectly bribe him.
(A mostly tongue-in-cheek option 3: Trump doesn’t own these properties or directly profit from their use, but he’s too stupid to realize this, so you can still curry favor with him by using them.)
Perhaps I’m missing some nuance that would reconcile the two (maybe part of the name licensing is a cut of profits).
Skeletor, from what I understand, but don’t quote me on this because I’m not an expert on Trump’s financial holdings, but it seems like he licenses his name to a great many people, and gets paid for that. He also owns some properties. So it’s sort of combination of the two, but for some unknown and inexplicable reason people want to make him all of one thing or all of another, when the ideas of renting your name and owning property in your own name are not mutually exclusive, but the form of the claims you’ve stated above, and which I’ve often seen myself, are mutually exclusive.
Skeletor, my impression is he exaggerates his wealth. That doesn’t mean he’s not what you and I would call “fucking loaded,” just that he’s not really as wealthy as he pretends to be.
Also, (and also my impression rather than solid knowledge) he’s in a lot of debt. But he’s good at weaseling out of that.