A world that tells children that girls and boys are good at different things
Where does this bias come from?
Two scientists have launched a campaign to get a copy of a book that debunks accepted scientific “facts” about women into every state school in the UK.
The physicist Jess Wade, best known as “chief troublemaker at Imperial College London”, and Claire Murray, a chemist and beamline scientist at a UKsynchrotron, are raising funds to buy copies of Inferior: How Science Got Women Wrong and the New Science That’s Rewriting the Story by Angela Saini. The actor Daniel Radcliffe has described it as one of his favourite books.
The pair are hoping to raise £15,000 via a crowdfunding campaign in an effort to encourage more girls and young women to educate themselves about the structural barriers they face and how to overcome them.
“Reading Inferior changed our lives, and completely changed the way we thought about diversity,” Wade said. “There are a huge number of campaigns to get girls into science, but while a lot of money is being spent, there is no evidence that they work.
“But Inferior is a breath of fresh air; instead of saying we are so hard done by because we are women, it is written by an engineer who is examining where this bias comes from, and how it’s invaded our social consciousness.”
I think I know one place this bias comes from: everywhere. It’s ubiquitous.
The pair point out that young women make up only a fifth of physics A-level students, a quarter of undergraduate students and a tenth of physics professors. “This isn’t because of ability – girls outperform boys at GCSE and A-level – or enthusiasm, but because we exist in a world that tells children that girls and boys are good at different things. We meet too many girls who, despite being brilliant, are not confident, and are unsure of their own potential to become scientists,” they write on the crowdfunding page.
in a world that tells children that girls and boys are good at different things – in other words the Damore memo, the one he circulated at work to explain why women didn’t belong there. I say this because I know of otherwise-intelligent people who still insist he had every right to circulate his opinion that women didn’t belong in the place where he worked, and that it’s a terrible violation of free speech that he was fired.
“The chief distinction in the intellectual powers of the two sexes is [shown] by man attaining to a higher eminence, in whatever he takes up, than woman can attain – whether requiring deep thought, reason or imagination, or merely the use of the senses and hands,” Darwin wrote in The Descent of Man, published in 1871. “Thus man has ultimately become superior to woman.”
Saini also tells the less well-known story of Caroline Kennard, a member of the women’s movement in Boston, who replied in 1881: “Let the ‘environment’ of women be similar to that of men and with his opportunities, before she be fairly judged, intellectually his inferior, please.”
The author has promised to sign every book the campaign purchases, and the publisher, 4th Estate, has agreed to match the amount raised and organise distribution.
I read that book – it’s excellent. Everyone should read it. I am currently reading The New Soft War on Women, which should also be required reading.
I have to work with one of those Damore types, though he is less noisy about it. He regales me with the things Jordan Peterson says that are right, and stands in my office asking the oh, so innocent question “I just don’t understand how there can be no differences if our brains are being bathed in all those different hormones!”. He is a biologist, and assumes this means he can speak about this with more authority than I (also a biologist, in a very closely related field – I am a botanist, he an entomologist). And he replaced my wonderfully good friend who left last summer, and who would never have said such nonsense out loud, and probably never thought such nonsense…my old buddy also asked me to please let him know if he was being sexist obliviously, since as a man he might not be aware how things might sound to a woman.
Where can I buy this book? I think it would be useful – both to read and to put on the shelf at work.
That book is the first hit if you search Amazon UK for “Inferior”. Only £2.99 for Kindle. I’m grabbing it.
iknklast:
It does not take an Einstein to perceive that there are differences between mammalian individuals within the same sex and between the sexes: just as there are between apes and humans, and between any one species and another.
In my experience, this sort of statement sooner or later leads to speculation or conclusion regarding origins and rank, leading straight on to questions of sexual poitics.
Sexual dimorphism is stuff for science. Sexual difference in privilege and power is something else again. I dare say that human history would have been a bit different if our species were more like those arachnids whose females are vastly more massive than the males.
Average 500 kg women would probably not incline to put up with much crap from average 100 kg men.
Coincidentally, I bought the audible version yesterday. I’m looking forward to it even more now.