A reckoning of his own
Now there’s Schneiderman.
Eric Schneiderman, New York’s attorney general, has long been a liberal Democratic champion of women’s rights, and recently he has become an outspoken figure in the #MeToo movement against sexual harassment. As New York State’s highest-ranking law-enforcement officer, Schneiderman, who is sixty-three, has used his authority to take legal action against the disgraced film mogul Harvey Weinstein, and to demand greater compensation for the victims of Weinstein’s alleged sexual crimes.
Great. But…
Now Schneiderman is facing a reckoning of his own. As his prominence as a voice against sexual misconduct has risen, so, too, has the distress of four women with whom he has had romantic relationships or encounters. They accuse Schneiderman of having subjected them to nonconsensual physical violence. All have been reluctant to speak out, fearing reprisal. But two of the women, Michelle Manning Barish and Tanya Selvaratnam, have talked to The New Yorker on the record, because they feel that doing so could protect other women. They allege that he repeatedly hit them, often after drinking, frequently in bed and never with their consent.
And what does he say? That it was “role-playing” in “the privacy of intimate relationships.” So I guess he was playing the role of a guy who hits women and the women he hit were…emergency understudies who didn’t know they were playing women who got hit?
Or in other words he says it was kink, and kink is private and intimate, and how dare you.
He says it was consensual and the women say it was absolutely not consensual.
Am I the only one who thinks this whole business of calling it “kink” and “role-playing” is turning out to be just a pretext for men to belt women and get away with it?
Schneiderman’s activism on behalf of feminist causes has increasingly won him praise from women’s groups. On May 1st, the New York-based National Institute for Reproductive Health honored him as one of three “Champions of Choice” at its annual fund-raising luncheon. Accepting the award, Schneiderman said, “If a woman cannot control her body, she is not truly equal.” But, as Manning Barish sees it, “you cannot be a champion of women when you are hitting them and choking them in bed, and saying to them, ‘You’re a fucking whore.’ ” She says of Schneiderman’s involvement in the Weinstein investigation, “How can you put a perpetrator in charge of the country’s most important sexual-assault case?” Selvaratnam describes Schneiderman as “a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde” figure, and says that seeing him lauded as a supporter of women has made her “feel sick,” adding, “This is a man who has staked his entire career, his personal narrative, on being a champion for women publicly. But he abuses them privately. He needs to be called out.”
One wonders how many there are like that.
Sorry to dredge her up, but this caused me to go back to read Greta Christina’s blog post that had finally put me totally off of her and made me recognize how disgusting and superficial was her thinking. (http://gretachristina.typepad.com/greta_christinas_weblog/2011/02/hes-a-super-freak-tiger-woods-and-sexual-compassion.html)
GC talks about reading Tiger Woods’ texts to his girlfriend (with whom he was cheating on his wife), in which he says he wanted to: “Slap your face. Treat you like a dirty little whore. Put my cock in your ass and then shove it down your throat[….] Hold you down while i choke you and Fuck that ass that i own[….] Then im going to tell you to shut the Fuck up while i slap your face and pull your hair for making noise.”
And after reading this GC says: “All of a sudden, my perspective on Tiger Woods was no longer, ‘Powerful man with a sense of sexual entitlement, who cheats on his wife with impunity and doesn’t think sexual ethics apply to him.’ All of a sudden, my perspective was, ‘Oh. He’s kinky.'”
Uh, ok. Not sure those two are mutually exclusive but whatever. She goes on to say: “What are you supposed to do if you start figuring out, partway through your marriage, that you’re kinky? That the fantasies you’ve been having for most of your life may be more than just fantasies? That they may be a core part of your sexuality, without which sex is always going to be disconnected and unsatisfying?”
Well, there it is. It’s just a core part if his sexuality, and who are we to judge him? The only thing he did wrong under the pro-kink formulation was a failure to go through adequate “consent” procedures, at worst. But his underlying desire to treat women this way, well, who are we to kink-shame him?
Reminds me of Richard Carrier, although his thing was not ‘roleplay’ violence but rather “habitual boundary pushing” if I remember correctly.
It reminds me a lot of Jian Ghomeshi, the CBC broadcaster who liked to slap and choke women without warning.
Jennifer –
Oh.dear.god.
That “What are you supposed to do” thing. Gee, yeah – what are you supposed to do if you find you have fantasies about murdering people and that’s a core part of your sexuality, without which sex is always going to be disconnected and unsatisfying?
You’re supposed to put up with unsatisfying sex rather than putting your fantasies into action and harming other people. Was that supposed to be a tough question?
Fucking hell.
Just read a bit of that post of Greta’s. A bit was more than enough.
(No need to be sorry for dredging her up though. It’s good to know.)
Really gross, isn’t it?
Here’s how adults in long term relationships do it. We discuss our changing desires with our partners *all the time*. We keep an open mind, we compromise, we find things that are fun for everyone involved. That is what we’re “supposed” to do, Greta. It is a wildly successful model, I recommend it.
What we don’t do is suddenly flip a kink switch in secret and decide we can hurt our partners without guilt.
Christ that woman winds me up. She’s really good at making lists but not so great on the actual thinking.
@Holms:
Didn’t even Greta ban Carrier from her comments? Or was that someone else? I remember the… uh… oversharing that prompted whoever it was to ban him. It wasn’t pleasant.
@O
I got as far as paragraph 2.
Just to answer the question for any lurkers who stumble across this:
“What are you supposed to do if you start figuring out, partway through your marriage, that you’re kinky?”
Talk to your partner about it.
A lot of this shit where “Oh he’s just kinky” – sorry consent isn’t some optional something, ignoring consent is not just some harmless quirk. However you get your rocks off, so long as everyone involved is a consenting adult, that’s your business. That consenting bit though? That’s pretty fucking important.
Sex is unsatisfying because your kink isn’t being serviced? Well sucks to be you, the world doesn’t exist for the sake of your sexual satisfaction. Even if you are a famous golf pro, or a political representative, or a renowned physicist, or a philosophy prof, or a comedian, or a president.
@Bruce G:
It is. But it’s still not enough if you’re in a relationship because… that’s what a relationship *is*. Consent is the start of it, but surely the goal is for everyone involved to have a great time.
You’re absolutely right. You talk about it. It’s just an ordinary conversation, a lot less fraught than the One True Argument in any lasting relationship, which is about how to pack the dishwasher.
Seriously, you put the sharp knives in point down, you fucking deviant. And you don’t turn the thing on until it is full – TETRIS full.
So those are my tips for a happy relationship. Talk enthusiastically about what you want to do with each other and follow my rules about the dishwasher.
And elsewhere, references to him ‘drinking heavily.’ Just tucked in their parenthetically.
A vast array of supposed ‘kink’ is just deliberate misogyny veiled as ‘liberation.’ And women are co-conspirators in this. Its women who drove the sales of the ’50 Shades’ nonsense, and, if you factor out race, its women who voted for Trump and Roy Moore.
Just yesterday, snippets come out about Giulani/Trump. Donnie didn’t want to hire Rudy a while back…he kept passing out during meetings, and ‘drank too much.’
On Woods: Checking the source, here’s the beginning of the ‘kink’ crap, after a long exchange of ‘mutual bantering.’
Joslyn: Sent: 04:06 PM 08/29/2009:
My screenplay really isn’t coming together. Need some dialogue for the enraged donkey-owning farmer.
Tiger: Sent: 04:08 PM 08/29/2009:
Hold you down while i choke you and Fuck that ass that i own
et. sec.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/low_concept/2010/03/thats_what_she_said.html
Weird and creepy, but scarcely any kind of kink manifesto the way Christina extracted it.
Thing is, if it’s ‘part of his sexuality’ and he’s doing it without their consent… We call that rape, don’t we? And generally, rape is held as a worse sin than ‘mere’ physical assault. Including a sexual element enhances the offense and criminality of the act, rather than diminish it.