We need to shift that discourse
A student group at Laurier University, Lspirg Waterloo, has posted an essay explaining its positionality. LSPIRG stands for Laurier Students’ Public Interest Research Group; it identifies as a social justice group.
Dear Laurier Community,
Due to recent events on the Laurier Waterloo campus and the heightened media coverage, we feel it is our responsibility to speak out against the level of transphobia that has been emerging on campus and in on-line forms.
We have spent a lot of time over the last while speaking about “freedom of speech”. We have, however, not spent much time questioning how the increase of transphobic rhetoric on campus has been impacting students and the larger community. If there is one thing we request of the Laurier community at this time, it is to acknowledge whose voices are being left out when we see these constant articles hitting the news. Who is getting the most amount of air time. Who is getting lots of time to explain their side of the story. And who is not?
Trans students have, without a doubt, been silenced throughout this process. There have been a small handful of articles or interviews released that provide any sort of context from their perspective. And when they do get coverage (such as in the Cord), entire stacks of newspapers are destroyed and returned to the steps of the Cord. So we ask you again, who is being silenced in this situation? Who is having their right to share their side of the story taken from them? And who has little or no ability to change the public discourse?
But is the story in question about “trans students”? All of them? Do we know that? If so, how do we know it? Lindsay Shepherd is the one who was hauled before a tribunal of three people berating her for ridiculous reasons; why are “trans students” supposed to have equal coverage?
The post is framing the issue as if Shepherd had abused “trans students” but that of course is not the case. The three sanctimonious goons who bullied her are the Other Side of this story; the story is not directly about trans people or “trans students.”
The discourse of “freedom of speech” is being used in order to strip the ongoing situation of all its context. We need to shift that discourse so that we can actually see the underlying issues. We need to see what is at the root of this discussion and why trans students feel so passionately about it.
Or to put it another way, we need to claim and insist that this story about three academics bullying a grad student is actually about [all] trans students so that we can claim the “underlying issues” are quite different from the ones being discussed.
We need to acknowledge that “debates” that invalidate the existence of trans people or dehumanize trans people based on their gender is both a form of transphobia and a form of gendered violence. And we need to acknowledge that there is no neutral way to demand that someone defend their existence and their right to a safe educational environment.
Nah, you don’t. You don’t need to acknowledge claims that are not true. Nobody invalidated the existence of trans people or dehumanized trans people; that’s just the familiar irrational catastrophizing bullshit that everyone is so tired of.
For these reasons, we stand in solidarity with the trans students on campus who are continuing to make their voices heard despite brutal and harsh opposition. We stand in solidarity with the trans and non-binary students who are not making their voices heard. Who are keeping to themselves or staying silent out of fear, intimidation, exhaustion, or a range of other valid justifications.
Or, perhaps, because they have enough sense to realize the bullying of Shepherd is not about them and they don’t need to make everything about them.
We stand in solidarity with every trans and non-binary individual (student or not) who has been caught up in the whirlwind of social media and mainstream news that so consistently tells them that they are not important or worthy of having a voice in this discussion.
Nobody is telling them any such fucking thing. The melodrama is not persuasive.
Silenced. Violence. Defend their existence. Brutal opposition.
Doesn’t the hyperbole get exhausting?
It often seems like these champions of oppressed groups are trying to jump on what might be last train out of the station. This might be their last chance to mount the battlements for a righteous cause. And, by god, they’re going to grab it with both hands.
I swear to the Flying Spaghetti Monster I am soooooooooo tired of these lobotomized bozos who can’t see women with a telescope. How about standing in solidarity WITH WOMEN, you blithering excuses for a waste of space? If whatever you’re standing for does not, at the same time, promote the same rights for women, you’re not arguing for rights or justice at all.
You’re just arguing for special treatment for your pet group.
But we knew that.
I laughed out loud when I read your introductory paragraph, Ophelia. Well done.
Air-quotes can be so telling in their selective application, can’t they?
“Is the story about ‘trans students'” you ask.
Every fucking thing seems to be about transgender and the perceived victimisation/harassment/erasement thereof nowadays.
One of these days, we’re sure to hear about a transgendered person who just wants to quietly pass and live in a fairly recognizable but kind, respectful world… who is thereby oppressing all transgendered people.
Something I heard mentioned on CBC radio news & looked for on Google
http://www.570news.com/2017/11/24/free-speech-rally-held-near-laurier-support-ta-lindsay-shepherd/
One thing I’ve learned from feminism is to notice when “we” means “we default humans” and notice who that omits. So it’s easy for me to recognize the LSPIRG statement says “we” to mean “we Non-Trans Trans Activists” (NTTAs) and omits trans people.
My apologies for coining a term, but NTTAs are a thing. This drama at WLU is driven by NTTAs, from the university president down. And I don’t see any benefit to trans people.
Good point. More the opposite of benefit. The peremptory unreasonable demands and catastrophizing exclamations are not likely to work out well in the long run, and all these NTTAs rushing to echo them are not doing trans people any favors.
I am coming to the conclusion that the hyper-adversity of many trans activists to be being perceived as gender non-conforming has something to do with having gone through life as a straight male, the default societal setting. Suddenly pushing up against all the sexism and homophobia women, gay men and lesbians have encountered all their lives is too much for them. Thus the insistence on being called real women and the willingness to attack feminists and lesbians.
I dunno.
“Brutal” but verbal opposition. Makes perfect sense.
Report on CBC National, Nov. 24, 2017 (at 13:35) and interview with Lindsay Shepherd (at 16:45).
http://www.cbc.ca/player/play/1103332419584
… full interview starts at 17:20 after clip at 16:45
The Revolution must continue, only in other forms and with whatever objectives yield maximum anger. Revolution in the political field withered and died decades ago and must be supplanted with … oh, whatever hits the bricks.