To honor members of the Crescent City White League
New Orleans on Monday began removing four monuments dedicated to the era of the Confederacy and its aftermath, capping a prolonged battle about the future of the memorials, which critics deemed symbols of racism and intolerance and which supporters viewed as historically important.
Workers dismantled an obelisk, which was erected in 1891 to honor members of the Crescent City White League who in 1874 fought in the Reconstruction-era Battle of Liberty Place against the racially integrated New Orleans police and state militia, Mayor Mitch Landrieu said in a statement.
That is of course “historically important” but not in the sense of “needs preservation in situ.” It’s historically very important that the South successfully resisted and defeated Reconstruction, but that doesn’t mean that monuments honoring that resistance are part of our Precious Heritage and must be retained. The monument honored the resistance. The resistance was all about keeping brown people forever subjugated. That’s not something we should keep on honoring with monuments.
The monument, which was sometimes used as a rallying point by David Duke and the Ku Klux Klan, has stirred debate for decades. Local leaders unsuccessfully tried to remove it in 1981 and 1993.
The workers were dressed in flak jackets, helmets and scarves to conceal their identities because of concerns about their safety. Police officers watched from a nearby hotel.
The monument was taken away on flatbed trucks.
The monuments were erected decades after the Civil War ended by people who wanted to demonstrate that the South should feel no guilt in having fought the war, the mayor’s statement said.
And no guilt in having fought to defend the institution of slavery.
The debate over Confederate symbols has taken center stage since nine people were killed at a black church in South Carolina in June 2015. South Carolina removed the Confederate battle flag, which flew at its State House for more than 50 years, and other Southern cities have considered taking down monuments.
Harcourt Fuller, an assistant professor of history at Georgia State University in Atlanta, and a scholar of national and regional symbolism, said in an email that supporters of the monuments see them as part of their “historical and cultural legacy that needs to be maintained and protected.
“We’re talking largely about these concrete symbols,” he added. “By themselves, they’re lifeless. They’re not living symbols. But we as citizens project our own historical values onto them.”
And then we shoot up black churches.
The Liberty Place monument, which was 35 to 40 feet tall, commemorated a violent uprising by white Democrats against the racial integration of the city’s police force and the Republicans who governed Louisiana. The White League won the battle and forcibly removed the governor, but federal troops arrived three days later to return the governor to power.
The battle remained an important symbol to those who resisted Reconstruction, the period of transforming Confederate states after the Civil War. From 1932 until 1993, the monument bore a plaque that said, in part, that the “national election of November 1876 recognized white supremacy in the South and gave us our state,” the city statement said.
It wasn’t just the “period of transforming Confederate states” – it was the period of trying to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment in the South, of trying to establish and entrench a regime of civil rights, of trying to block efforts to reinstate slavery via Jim Crow laws. Generations of African Americans were much worse off because white supremacists successfully resisted.
And I was reading a poll not long ago that suggested that 55% of white Republicans and 26% of white Democrats believe that the reason the African Americans are not better off is that they don’t take advantage of opportunities and don’t do anything to help themselves.
I guess that’s the new phrase we’re using to mean “lazy”.
And these are the folks that elevated Trump to the White House, and gave Marine LePen a second place in France (and possibly a first place in the runoff – right now that’s not predicted, but…well, Trump winning wasn’t predicted, either).
Oh, and in case anyone misunderstands – I am not suggesting that Trump voters voted for Marine LePen, only that people who think like Trump voters voted for Marine LePen.
Well, they share the very same Putinbots …
I don’t understand how Americans can be so proud of breaking their own most basic laws, the Constitution, which they all have to swear allegiance to every day in school and before taking any office – or so I’m led to believe.
Anyway, a propos those bots (sorry about formatting; the French Connection is somewhere in her massive tweet flow, iirc) :
Caroline O. @RVAwonk 2 minför 2 minuter sedan
Svar till @RVAwonk
Caroline O. Retweetade Caroline O.
If true, then when Roger Stone communicated w/ Guccifer 2.0, he was communicating w/the Russian hackers. Directly.
Caroline O. lade till
New report links Guccifer 2.0 directly to Pawn Storm – AKA Fancy Bear, the Kremlin-backed group behind the DNC hack. https://documents.trendmicro.com/assets/wp/wp-two-years-of-pawn-storm.pdf
and reminds us
Caroline O. @RVAwonk 30 mars
The first person Sen. Mark Warner mentioned at the Senate Intel Cmte hearing is… Roger Stone! (not by name; by actions)
14 svar 197 retweets 564 gillanden
Caroline O. @RVAwonk
Caroline O. Retweetade Caroline O.
“A Trump associate predicted [content of hacked emails] .. &. admitted contact with Guccifer 2.0, a Russian agent.”
It’s a full time job to read @RVAwonk ‘s prodigious output. Not uplifting but informative. One last sample:
Caroline O. @RVAwonk 3 minför 3 minuter sedan
Svar till @RVAwonk
Caroline O. Retweetade Caroline O.
Link to full report on Fancy Bear/Pawn Storm hacking targets & methods: https://documents.trendmicro.com/assets/wp/wp-two-years-of-pawn-storm.pdf …
Caroline O. @RVAwonk 4 minför 4 minuter sedan
This will be important -> Fancy Bear targeted Academi – the group formerly known as Blackwater. Owned by Erik Prince. Betsy DeVos’s brother.
Try going to Gettysburg site sometime. It’s an important historical site, of course, covering several fields. But it’s downright surreal looking at the monuments.
See, the site is dotted with memorials dedicated to each individual company, most of them placed where the unit (is believed to have) first engaged in the battle. It usually includes the composition of the unit, the date and time they arrived, historical notes about their role in the battle, and the number of wounded/dead.
It’s that penultimate item that’s the rub. See, most of these monuments were bought by, and are maintained by, various organizations dedicated to the unit’s memory, from their home state (and often populated mainly by descendants of the soldiers). And the Confederate memorials all talk about the courage and bravery and valor of the troops. Never once about how they were, at best, dupes for Southern landowners who wanted to maintain their class-system, using poor white people to fight for the right of rich white people to own black people, in part by convincing the poor white people that so long as there were black people who had it worse, there would always be someone they could look down on.
‘South Carolina removed the Confederate battle flag, which flew at its State House for more than 50 years…’
Notice? That’s just since the 1960s. Not some heroic ‘resistance’ gesture from Reconstruction. The huge increase in Confederate Kitch, and the relentless historical revisionism, came in response to Civil Rights.
That any ‘patriotic’ American would tolerate the display of the Confederate Army flag (note that they don’t use the NATIONAL flag) is as shocking as flying the Swastika, or the Rising Sun. The Confederacy sought to dissolve the Union of the United States, and dissolve the Constitution. By what magic of myth-making has this been turned ‘patriotic?’
Shouldn’t such monuments be maintained in much the same way that Auschwitz is maintained?
I think it’s good to remind people that the forces of evil sometimes win & we should not pretend they are not evil.
They are being maintained; they’re being removed to museums and archives and similar. Yes, they should be, but they shouldn’t be kept in place as monuments.