This is code-word information
God damn. I was out getting Cooper wet and muddy and tired all afternoon, and I was just browsing Twitter and kicking back when I encountered the Post’s latest scoop. Donnie talked about top-secret shit with his Russian guests.
President Trump revealed highly classified information to the Russian foreign minister and ambassador in a White House meeting last week, according to current and former U.S. officials, who said Trump’s disclosures jeopardized a critical source of intelligence on the Islamic State.
The information the president relayed had been provided by a U.S. partner through an intelligence-sharing arrangement considered so sensitive that details have been withheld from allies and tightly restricted even within the U.S. government, officials said.
A source on IS, and Mister BewareoftheScaryMooslims blabs it because he’s showing off to the Russians.
The partner had not given the United States permission to share the material with Russia, and officials said Trump’s decision to do so endangers cooperation from an ally that has access to the inner workings of the Islamic State. After Trump’s meeting, senior White House officials took steps to contain the damage, placing calls to the CIA and the National Security Agency.
Those must have been awkward conversations.
“This is code-word information,” said a U.S. official familiar with the matter, using terminology that refers to one of the highest classification levels used by American spy agencies. Trump “revealed more information to the Russian ambassador than we have shared with our own allies.”
No wonder they were grinning so hard in those photos that Trump didn’t realize they were going to make public.
One day after dismissing Comey, Trump welcomed Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Ambassador Sergey Kislyak — a key figure in earlier Russia controversies — into the Oval Office. It was during that meeting, officials said, that Trump went off script and began describing details of an Islamic State terrorist threat related to the use of laptop computers on aircraft.
Oh gawd.
Because he’s prez, he didn’t do anything illegal. It’s just that it was a very bad thing to do, that’s all.
But officials expressed concern about Trump’s handling of sensitive information as well as his grasp of the potential consequences. Exposure of an intelligence stream that has provided critical insight into the Islamic State, they said, could hinder the United States’ and its allies’ ability to detect future threats.
But no biggy, right? Certainly Trump has never expressed any alarm about Islamic State…
“It is all kind of shocking,” said a former senior U.S. official who is close to current administration officials. “Trump seems to be very reckless and doesn’t grasp the gravity of the things he’s dealing with, especially when it comes to intelligence and national security. And it’s all clouded because of this problem he has with Russia.”
In his meeting with Lavrov, Trump seemed to be boasting about his inside knowledge of the looming threat. “I get great intel. I have people brief me on great intel every day,” the president said, according to an official with knowledge of the exchange.
Oh god. Oh god oh god oh god. This is what we all knew would happen; this is the idiocy and engorged vanity that we knew would make it happen; but how is it possible that no one can stop this?
Trump went on to discuss aspects of the threat that the United States learned only through the espionage capabilities of a key partner. He did not reveal the specific intelligence-gathering method, but he described how the Islamic State was pursuing elements of a specific plot and how much harm such an attack could cause under varying circumstances. Most alarmingly, officials said, Trump revealed the city in the Islamic State’s territory where the U.S. intelligence partner detected the threat.
Fuuuuuuuuuuuck.
Well, on the day when ten passenger jets are blown out of the sky, we’ll know we have Trump to thank…unless we were on one of the planes.
The identification of the location was seen as particularly problematic, officials said, because Russia could use that detail to help identify the U.S. ally or intelligence capability involved. Officials said the capability could be useful for other purposes, possibly providing intelligence on Russia’s presence in Syria. Moscow would be keenly interested in identifying that source and perhaps disrupting it.
This is horrifying.
A former intelligence official who handled high-level intelligence on Russia said that given the clues Trump provided, “I don’t think that it would be that hard [for Russian spy services] to figure this out.”
At a more fundamental level, the information wasn’t the United States’ to provide to others. Under the rules of espionage, governments — and even individual agencies — are given significant control over whether and how the information they gather is disseminated, even after it has been shared. Violating that practice undercuts trust considered essential to sharing secrets.
But we have an angry toddler as head of state, so that’s that.
The officials declined to identify the ally but said it has previously voiced frustration with Washington’s inability to safeguard sensitive information related to Iraq and Syria.
“If that partner learned we’d given this to Russia without their knowledge or asking first, that is a blow to that relationship,” the U.S. official said.
Trump also described measures that the United States has taken or is contemplating to counter the threat, including military operations in Iraq and Syria, as well as other steps to tighten security, officials said.
And this is inevitable and will go on happening because he refuses to read the briefings that tell him not to do this kind of thing, and why.
Trump has repeatedly gone off-script in his dealings with high-ranking foreign officials, most notably in his contentious introductory conversation with the Australian prime ministerearlier this year. He has also faced criticism for seemingly lax attention to security at his Florida retreat, Mar-a-Lago, where he appeared to field preliminary reports of a North Korea missile launch in full view of casual diners.
U.S. officials said that the National Security Council continues to prepare multi-page briefings for Trump to guide him through conversations with foreign leaders, but that he has insisted that the guidance be distilled to a single page of bullet points — and often ignores those.
“He seems to get in the room or on the phone and just goes with it, and that has big downsides,” the second former official said. “Does he understand what’s classified and what’s not? That’s what worries me.”
I keep saying – many people keep saying – this level of stupidity is dangerous in a president.
This shit has seriously got to stop.
Stupid and reckless and easily manipulated. Putting aside the idiocy involved in leaking codeword information because you’re trying to impress a foreign leader…. why is he trying to show off for the Russian foreign minister in the first place?
Does he think that the Russians don’t know that the U.S. President has access to confidential…. oh god, he probably didn’t realize that, because he probably just learned it himself. This is a guy who still rants about Obama bugging him because of something he read on Breitbart or wherever, no matter what the intelligence community tells him.
Things I expect to hear Trump brag about in the future:
“You know, I don’t just work at the White House, I actually LIVE there. Did you know that? Most people don’t know that, but I actually have a bedroom there and everything.”
“If I don’t like a bill that Congress passes, I can VETO it! That means it doesn’t become law! I bet you didn’t know that!”
“I’M A BIG BOY PRESIDENT! THEY LET ME PLAY WITH ALL THE BIG PRESIDENTIAL TOYS! I GET EXTRA SCOOPS OF ICE CREAM!”
WILL NO ONE RID US OF HIM?
Sure, it sounds bad, but remember: Hillary Clinton had emails. On a computer!
“How is it possible that no one can stop this?”
Because it’s the nature of the role of President. It’s why you don’t elect idiots to fill it. Maybe the role should be rethought.
I know, but that’s the thing – since it is the nature of the role of President, there should be some way to filter out reckless imbeciles.
Or, change the nature of the role of President. Democracy seems to be in a pretty shoddy state at the moment, and in need of a revamp.
What would be the sentence handed down to mere mortals who divulged this information to a foreign power?
I say give him all the ice cream he wants and maybe he’ll eat himself to (physical) incapacitation.
The President is in fact above the law and can do whatever he wants. If we survived this can *NEVER* happen again; there need to be safeguards in place.
… according to current and former U.S. officials …
… officials said.
… and officials said …
… said a U.S. official familiar with the matter …
… officials said …
As much as this confirms my biases, I stopped believing uncorroborated stories sourced to anonymous officials long ago. It saved me being fooled by those Saddam anthrax and yellow cake stories, among many others.
“After Mr Comey was dismissed via a signed letter, handed over by Mr Trump’s body guard, the White House reportedly descended into chaos.
“Advisers said the President has been ‘screaming at the television’ when journalists covered his potential ties to Russia and advisers did not know how to work with him.”
What Trump clearly needs is a TV set that responds to voice commands.
He reportedly also wants a complete purge of the White House staff . It’s all straight out of Stalin’s playbook. You could not make this stuff up.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-mass-white-house-cull-considered-senior-trusted-advisers-fired-sean-spicer-steve-bannon-a7736451.html
I just looked at the Indy piece linked by Omar. At the end we see the deeper problem. Trump apparently still has around 40% approval.
That is frightening.
https://www.facebook.com/144310995587370/photos/a.271728576178944.71555.144310995587370/1539155809436208/?type=3&theater
Stories attributed to anonymous sources are corroborated via the exact same methods used for those whose sources are willing to be identified.
And named sources can also lie.
It all could well come to something like this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturday_Night_Massacre
https://www.facebook.com/144310995587370/photos/a.271728576178944.71555.144310995587370/1539229296095526/?type=3&theater
So many stories about Trump’s ridiculous/egregious behaviour finish with “it’s not illegal for the current president to do this: he is exempt from this regulation/ law”. Nobody imagined a President who would flout common sense and procedure as Trump has. President No.46 is going to face an absolute barrage of new rules and regulations.
I wonder what kind of knots all those people who thought Trump was a better choice than Hillary Clinton are tying themselves into right now, seeing how catastrophically awful it is.
I am wondering, why does anyone want to work with Trump? Machiavelli wouldn’t have gone near him.
Hey, hypocrisy. Who could possibly have expected that? https://boingboing.net/2017/05/15/trumpleaks.html
Sam Day: Because then there would be no way to make him stop doing this. Trump’s misconduct isn’t a one-and-done deal; it’s ongoing and accelerating. Accepting that this asset’s cover has been blown may be necessary in order to finally provide the impetus for either Ryan to grudgingly activate the Pence Option, or for the electorate to put in a Congress that will answer the need for impeachment.
They would have corroborated the story using standard journalistic procedure.
The yellowcake story was somewhat different. It’s hard for reporters to verify documents (that did indeed exist, but were forged) that they couldn’t even see because they were classified.
A meeting that happened the day before yesterday? The meeting happened. Reporters tipped off would have verified by approaching at least one other party.
Of course the story could still be false, but its truth or falseness has nothing to do with the fact that its sources are anonymous.
Anyway, at this point it’s obvious that the story is basically true. Trump’s response is “I’m allowed to do that.”
(But as far as I’m concerned its truth has been apparent since the national security advisors responded with tap dances):
Quote at #20 from this long but meaty article at Lawfare:
https://www.lawfareblog.com/bombshell-initial-thoughts-washington-posts-game-changing-story